Political Power and Social Theory: Rethinking the Colonial State

Søren Ivarsson; Søren Rud

Political Power and Social Theory: Rethinking the Colonial State

Søren Ivarsson (Redaktør), Søren Rud (Redaktør)

Saxo-Instituttet - Arkæologi, Etnologi, Historie og Græsk og Latin

Abstract

Studies of colonialism and empire have increasingly drawn attention to the problem of conceptualizing the political logic of colonial projects and the circumstances of state formation in colonial contexts. Concepts such as ‘colonial governmentality’ (Prakash, Thomas, Scott, Legg), ‘state effect’ and ‘enframing’ (Mitchell), ‘rule of difference’ (Chatterjee), ‘ethnographic state’ (Dirks), ‘the colonial state as a social field’ (Steinmetz), ‘affective state’ (Stoler) have contributed immensely to the analytical framing of the peculiarities of colonial rule. Still, the nature and workings of the colonial state remains undertheorized and underanalysed. With this workshop we wish to bring together a small group of scholars working on less studied colonial states. Hereby we wish to open up for a fruitful exchange on what such cases can tell us about the generic nature of the colonial state and hereby stimulate a retheorizing of the colonial state.

Originalsprog	Engelsk

Forlag	Emerald Group Publishing
Vol/bind	33
Antal sider	240
ISBN (Trykt)	978-1-78714-655-6
ISBN (Elektronisk)	978-1-78714-654-9
Status	Udgivet - 2017
Begivenhed	Reanalyzing the Colonial State: Theoretical and Empirical Perspective - Saxo Instituttet, Københavns Universitet, København, Danmark Varighed: 8 aug. 2016 → 8 aug. 2016

Workshop

Workshop	Reanalyzing the Colonial State: Theoretical and Empirical Perspective
Lokation	Saxo Instituttet, Københavns Universitet
Land/Område	Danmark
By	København
Periode	08/08/2016 → 08/08/2016

Emneord

Det Humanistiske Fakultet

Citationsformater

@book{1b69c5dc097a4cf69f97301628a43335,

title = "Political Power and Social Theory: Rethinking the Colonial State",

abstract = "Studies of colonialism and empire have increasingly drawn attention to the problem of conceptualizing the political logic of colonial projects and the circumstances of state formation in colonial contexts. Concepts such as {\textquoteleft}colonial governmentality{\textquoteright} (Prakash, Thomas, Scott, Legg), {\textquoteleft}state effect{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}enframing{\textquoteright} (Mitchell), {\textquoteleft}rule of difference{\textquoteright} (Chatterjee), {\textquoteleft}ethnographic state{\textquoteright} (Dirks), {\textquoteleft}the colonial state as a social field{\textquoteright} (Steinmetz), {\textquoteleft}affective state{\textquoteright} (Stoler) have contributed immensely to the analytical framing of the peculiarities of colonial rule. Still, the nature and workings of the colonial state remains undertheorized and underanalysed. With this workshop we wish to bring together a small group of scholars working on less studied colonial states. Hereby we wish to open up for a fruitful exchange on what such cases can tell us about the generic nature of the colonial state and hereby stimulate a retheorizing of the colonial state.",

keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Colonial state",

editor = "S{\o}ren Ivarsson and S{\o}ren Rud",

year = "2017",

language = "English",

isbn = " 978-1-78714-655-6 ",

volume = "33",

publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",

address = "United Kingdom",

note = "Reanalyzing the Colonial State: Theoretical and Empirical Perspective ; Conference date: 08-08-2016 Through 08-08-2016",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Political Power and Social Theory

T2 - Reanalyzing the Colonial State: Theoretical and Empirical Perspective

A2 - Ivarsson, Søren

A2 - Rud, Søren

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Studies of colonialism and empire have increasingly drawn attention to the problem of conceptualizing the political logic of colonial projects and the circumstances of state formation in colonial contexts. Concepts such as ‘colonial governmentality’ (Prakash, Thomas, Scott, Legg), ‘state effect’ and ‘enframing’ (Mitchell), ‘rule of difference’ (Chatterjee), ‘ethnographic state’ (Dirks), ‘the colonial state as a social field’ (Steinmetz), ‘affective state’ (Stoler) have contributed immensely to the analytical framing of the peculiarities of colonial rule. Still, the nature and workings of the colonial state remains undertheorized and underanalysed. With this workshop we wish to bring together a small group of scholars working on less studied colonial states. Hereby we wish to open up for a fruitful exchange on what such cases can tell us about the generic nature of the colonial state and hereby stimulate a retheorizing of the colonial state.

AB - Studies of colonialism and empire have increasingly drawn attention to the problem of conceptualizing the political logic of colonial projects and the circumstances of state formation in colonial contexts. Concepts such as ‘colonial governmentality’ (Prakash, Thomas, Scott, Legg), ‘state effect’ and ‘enframing’ (Mitchell), ‘rule of difference’ (Chatterjee), ‘ethnographic state’ (Dirks), ‘the colonial state as a social field’ (Steinmetz), ‘affective state’ (Stoler) have contributed immensely to the analytical framing of the peculiarities of colonial rule. Still, the nature and workings of the colonial state remains undertheorized and underanalysed. With this workshop we wish to bring together a small group of scholars working on less studied colonial states. Hereby we wish to open up for a fruitful exchange on what such cases can tell us about the generic nature of the colonial state and hereby stimulate a retheorizing of the colonial state.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Colonial state

M3 - Anthology

SN - 978-1-78714-655-6

VL - 33

BT - Political Power and Social Theory

PB - Emerald Group Publishing

Y2 - 8 August 2016 through 8 August 2016

ER -