Physicians’ progress notes

Jørgen P. Bansler; Erling C. Havn; Troels Mønsted; Kjeld Schmidt; Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7

Physicians’ progress notes

Jørgen P. Bansler, Erling C. Havn, Troels Mønsted, Kjeld Schmidt, Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

Datalogisk Institut

Abstract

Thispaperexaminesphysicians’progressnotes,anartifactthat,inspite of its obvious importance in the coordination of cooperative work in clinical set- tings, has not been subjected to systematic study under CSCW auspices. While several studies have addressed the role of the medical record in patient care, they have not dealt specifically with the role, structure, and content of the progress notes. As a consequence, CSCW research has not yet taken fully into account the fact that progress notes are coordinative artifacts of a rather special kind, an open-ended chain of prose texts, written sequentially by cooperating physicians for their own use as well as for that of their colleagues. We argue that progress notes are the core of the medical record, in that they marshal and summarize the overwhelming amount of data that is available in the modern hospital environment, and that their narrative format is uniquely adequate for the pivotal epistemic aspect of coopera- tive clinical work: the narrative format enables physicians to not only record ‘facts’ but also—by filtering, interpreting, organizing, and qualifying information—to make sense and act concertedly under conditions of uncertainty and contingency.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	ECSCW 2013 : Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2013, Paphos, Cyprus
Redaktører	Olav W. Bertelsen, Luigina Ciolfi, Maria Antonietta Grasso, George Angelos Papadopoulos
Antal sider	20
Forlag	Springer
Publikationsdato	2013
Sider	123-142
ISBN (Trykt)	978-1-4471-5345-0
ISBN (Elektronisk)	978-1-4471-5346-7
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7
Status	Udgivet - 2013
Begivenhed	13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - Paphos, Cypern Varighed: 21 sep. 2013 → 25 sep. 2013 Konferencens nummer: 13

Konference

Konference	13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Nummer	13
Land/Område	Cypern
By	Paphos
Periode	21/09/2013 → 25/09/2013

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7

Citationsformater

Physicians’ progress notes. / Bansler, Jørgen P.; Havn, Erling C.; Mønsted, Troels et al.
ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. red. / Olav W. Bertelsen; Luigina Ciolfi; Maria Antonietta Grasso; George Angelos Papadopoulos. Springer, 2013. s. 123-142.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › peer review

Bansler, JP, Havn, EC, Mønsted, T, Schmidt, K & Svendsen, JH 2013, Physicians’ progress notes. i OW Bertelsen, L Ciolfi, MA Grasso & GA Papadopoulos (red), ECSCW 2013: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2013, Paphos, Cyprus. Springer, s. 123-142, 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Paphos, Cypern, 21/09/2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7

@inproceedings{255c726e8aa44540a88392d4f7536d15,

title = "Physicians{\textquoteright} progress notes",

abstract = "Thispaperexaminesphysicians{\textquoteright}progressnotes,anartifactthat,inspite of its obvious importance in the coordination of cooperative work in clinical set- tings, has not been subjected to systematic study under CSCW auspices. While several studies have addressed the role of the medical record in patient care, they have not dealt specifically with the role, structure, and content of the progress notes. As a consequence, CSCW research has not yet taken fully into account the fact that progress notes are coordinative artifacts of a rather special kind, an open-ended chain of prose texts, written sequentially by cooperating physicians for their own use as well as for that of their colleagues. We argue that progress notes are the core of the medical record, in that they marshal and summarize the overwhelming amount of data that is available in the modern hospital environment, and that their narrative format is uniquely adequate for the pivotal epistemic aspect of coopera- tive clinical work: the narrative format enables physicians to not only record {\textquoteleft}facts{\textquoteright} but also—by filtering, interpreting, organizing, and qualifying information—to make sense and act concertedly under conditions of uncertainty and contingency.",

author = "Bansler, {J{\o}rgen P.} and Havn, {Erling C.} and Troels M{\o}nsted and Kjeld Schmidt and Svendsen, {Jesper Hastrup}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4471-5345-0",

pages = "123--142",

editor = "Bertelsen, {Olav W.} and Luigina Ciolfi and Grasso, {Maria Antonietta} and Papadopoulos, {George Angelos}",

booktitle = "ECSCW 2013",

publisher = "Springer",

note = "13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ECSCW 2013 ; Conference date: 21-09-2013 Through 25-09-2013",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Physicians’ progress notes

AU - Bansler, Jørgen P.

AU - Havn, Erling C.

AU - Mønsted, Troels

AU - Schmidt, Kjeld

AU - Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup

N1 - Conference code: 13

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Thispaperexaminesphysicians’progressnotes,anartifactthat,inspite of its obvious importance in the coordination of cooperative work in clinical set- tings, has not been subjected to systematic study under CSCW auspices. While several studies have addressed the role of the medical record in patient care, they have not dealt specifically with the role, structure, and content of the progress notes. As a consequence, CSCW research has not yet taken fully into account the fact that progress notes are coordinative artifacts of a rather special kind, an open-ended chain of prose texts, written sequentially by cooperating physicians for their own use as well as for that of their colleagues. We argue that progress notes are the core of the medical record, in that they marshal and summarize the overwhelming amount of data that is available in the modern hospital environment, and that their narrative format is uniquely adequate for the pivotal epistemic aspect of coopera- tive clinical work: the narrative format enables physicians to not only record ‘facts’ but also—by filtering, interpreting, organizing, and qualifying information—to make sense and act concertedly under conditions of uncertainty and contingency.

AB - Thispaperexaminesphysicians’progressnotes,anartifactthat,inspite of its obvious importance in the coordination of cooperative work in clinical set- tings, has not been subjected to systematic study under CSCW auspices. While several studies have addressed the role of the medical record in patient care, they have not dealt specifically with the role, structure, and content of the progress notes. As a consequence, CSCW research has not yet taken fully into account the fact that progress notes are coordinative artifacts of a rather special kind, an open-ended chain of prose texts, written sequentially by cooperating physicians for their own use as well as for that of their colleagues. We argue that progress notes are the core of the medical record, in that they marshal and summarize the overwhelming amount of data that is available in the modern hospital environment, and that their narrative format is uniquely adequate for the pivotal epistemic aspect of coopera- tive clinical work: the narrative format enables physicians to not only record ‘facts’ but also—by filtering, interpreting, organizing, and qualifying information—to make sense and act concertedly under conditions of uncertainty and contingency.

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4471-5346-7_7

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-4471-5345-0

SP - 123

EP - 142

BT - ECSCW 2013

A2 - Bertelsen, Olav W.

A2 - Ciolfi, Luigina

A2 - Grasso, Maria Antonietta

A2 - Papadopoulos, George Angelos

PB - Springer

T2 - 13th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Y2 - 21 September 2013 through 25 September 2013

ER -