TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase III trial of casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
AU - Herrstedt, Jørn
AU - Apornwirat, Wichit
AU - Shaharyar, Ahmed
AU - Aziz, Zeba
AU - Roila, Fausto
AU - Van Belle, Simon
AU - Russo, Mark W
AU - Levin, Jeremey
AU - Ranganathan, Salabha
AU - Guckert, Mary
AU - Grunberg, Steven M
N1 - Keywords: Administration, Oral; Alopecia; Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Constipation; Cyclophosphamide; Dexamethasone; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Headache; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Kaplan-Meiers Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasms; Neutropenia; Ondansetron; Piperazines; Piperidines; Receptors, Neurokinin-1; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regimens containing casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the first cycle in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Predominantly female patients (98%) diagnosed with breast cancer (96%) who were chemotherapy-naïve and scheduled to receive an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) -based regimen were enrolled onto this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 and oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3. Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm (placebo), a single oral dose casopitant arm (150 mg orally [PO] on day 1), a 3-day oral casopitant arm (150 mg PO on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3), or a 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm (90 mg IV on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting/retching or rescue medications) in the first 120 hours after the initiation of MEC. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of patients in the single-dose oral casopitant arm, 3-day oral casopitant arm, and 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm achieved complete response (73%, 73%, and 74%, respectively) versus control (59%; P < .0001). The study did not demonstrate a reduced proportion of patients with nausea or significant nausea in those receiving casopitant. Adverse events were balanced among study arms. CONCLUSION: All casopitant regimens studied were more effective than the control regimen. Casopitant was generally well tolerated.
AB - PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase III trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regimens containing casopitant, a novel neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting during the first cycle in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Predominantly female patients (98%) diagnosed with breast cancer (96%) who were chemotherapy-naïve and scheduled to receive an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) -based regimen were enrolled onto this multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial. All patients received dexamethasone 8 mg intravenously (IV) on day 1 and oral ondansetron 8 mg twice daily on days 1 to 3. Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm (placebo), a single oral dose casopitant arm (150 mg orally [PO] on day 1), a 3-day oral casopitant arm (150 mg PO on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3), or a 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm (90 mg IV on day 1 plus 50 mg PO on days 2 to 3). The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving complete response (no vomiting/retching or rescue medications) in the first 120 hours after the initiation of MEC. RESULTS: A significantly greater proportion of patients in the single-dose oral casopitant arm, 3-day oral casopitant arm, and 3-day IV/oral casopitant arm achieved complete response (73%, 73%, and 74%, respectively) versus control (59%; P < .0001). The study did not demonstrate a reduced proportion of patients with nausea or significant nausea in those receiving casopitant. Adverse events were balanced among study arms. CONCLUSION: All casopitant regimens studied were more effective than the control regimen. Casopitant was generally well tolerated.
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8511
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2009.21.8511
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19805683
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 27
SP - 5363
EP - 5369
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 32
ER -
