Persuasion Bias in Science: Can Economics Help?

Alfredo Di Tillio*, Marco Ottaviani, Peter Norman Sørensen

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde
    6 Citationer (Scopus)
    123 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    We investigate the impact of conflicts of interests on randomised controlled trials in a game-theoretic framework. A researcher seeks to persuade an evaluator that the causal effect of a treatment outweighs its cost, to justify acceptance. The researcher can use private information to manipulate the experiment in three alternative ways: (i) sampling subjects based on their treatment effect, (ii) assigning subjects to treatment based on their baseline outcome, or (iii) selectively reporting experimental outcomes. The resulting biases have different welfare implications: for sufficiently high acceptance cost, in our binary illustration the evaluator loses in cases (i) and (iii) but benefits in case (ii).

    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftEconomic Journal
    Vol/bind127
    Udgave nummer605
    Sider (fra-til)F266-F304
    ISSN0013-0133
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 1 okt. 2017

    Emneord

    • Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Persuasion Bias in Science: Can Economics Help?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater