Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum

Duncan McCargo; Saowanee T. Alexander; Petra Desatova

doi:10.1355/cs39-1b

Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum

Duncan McCargo, Saowanee T. Alexander, Petra Desatova

NIAS - Nordic Institute of Asian Studies

14 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Thailand’s August 2016 constitutional referendum marked the second occasion on which a military junta has sought popular endorsement to legitimize its efforts to reform the country’s political system. As in the previous referendum of August 2007, Thai voters endorsed military plans to reduce levels of democracy. Draconian moves by the regime curtailed open debate about the content of the draft constitution, which virtually nobody had read. Partly as a result of the junta’s suppression of dissent, “No” votes declined — but the draft charter was still opposed by almost 40 per cent of voters, testifying to continuing high levels of political polarization along regional lines. This article argues that the referendum process may have helped the military to impose order on Thai society during the difficult period of royal transition, but did not create any genuine peace between the country’s fractious competing groups and interests.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Contemporary Southeast Asia
Vol/bind	39
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	65-95
ISSN	0129-797X
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1355/cs39-1b
Status	Udgivet - apr. 2017

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1355/cs39-1b

Citationsformater

@article{d27f1d5df2004197ad3a1c23877e7d60,

title = "Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum",

abstract = "Thailand{\textquoteright}s August 2016 constitutional referendum marked the second occasion on which a military junta has sought popular endorsement to legitimize its efforts to reform the country{\textquoteright}s political system. As in the previous referendum of August 2007, Thai voters endorsed military plans to reduce levels of democracy. Draconian moves by the regime curtailed open debate about the content of the draft constitution, which virtually nobody had read. Partly as a result of the junta{\textquoteright}s suppression of dissent, “No” votes declined — but the draft charter was still opposed by almost 40 per cent of voters, testifying to continuing high levels of political polarization along regional lines. This article argues that the referendum process may have helped the military to impose order on Thai society during the difficult period of royal transition, but did not create any genuine peace between the country{\textquoteright}s fractious competing groups and interests.",

keywords = "Thailand, constitution, referendum, military, peace",

author = "Duncan McCargo and Alexander, {Saowanee T.} and Petra Desatova",

year = "2017",

month = apr,

doi = "10.1355/cs39-1b",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "65--95",

journal = "Contemporary Southeast Asia",

issn = "0129-797X",

publisher = "Institute of Southeast Asian Studies",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum

AU - McCargo, Duncan

AU - Alexander, Saowanee T.

AU - Desatova, Petra

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - Thailand’s August 2016 constitutional referendum marked the second occasion on which a military junta has sought popular endorsement to legitimize its efforts to reform the country’s political system. As in the previous referendum of August 2007, Thai voters endorsed military plans to reduce levels of democracy. Draconian moves by the regime curtailed open debate about the content of the draft constitution, which virtually nobody had read. Partly as a result of the junta’s suppression of dissent, “No” votes declined — but the draft charter was still opposed by almost 40 per cent of voters, testifying to continuing high levels of political polarization along regional lines. This article argues that the referendum process may have helped the military to impose order on Thai society during the difficult period of royal transition, but did not create any genuine peace between the country’s fractious competing groups and interests.

AB - Thailand’s August 2016 constitutional referendum marked the second occasion on which a military junta has sought popular endorsement to legitimize its efforts to reform the country’s political system. As in the previous referendum of August 2007, Thai voters endorsed military plans to reduce levels of democracy. Draconian moves by the regime curtailed open debate about the content of the draft constitution, which virtually nobody had read. Partly as a result of the junta’s suppression of dissent, “No” votes declined — but the draft charter was still opposed by almost 40 per cent of voters, testifying to continuing high levels of political polarization along regional lines. This article argues that the referendum process may have helped the military to impose order on Thai society during the difficult period of royal transition, but did not create any genuine peace between the country’s fractious competing groups and interests.

KW - Thailand

KW - constitution

KW - referendum

KW - military

KW - peace

U2 - 10.1355/cs39-1b

DO - 10.1355/cs39-1b

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0129-797X

VL - 39

SP - 65

EP - 95

JO - Contemporary Southeast Asia

JF - Contemporary Southeast Asia

IS - 1

ER -

Ordering Peace: Thailand's 2016 Constitutional Referendum

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater