TY - JOUR
T1 - One- and two-axis squeezing of atomic ensembles in optical cavities
AU - Borregaard, Johannes
AU - Davis, E.J.
AU - Bentsen, G.S.
AU - Schleier-Smith, M.H.
AU - Sørensen, Anders Søndberg
PY - 2017/9/28
Y1 - 2017/9/28
N2 - The strong light-matter coupling attainable in optical cavities enables the generation of highly squeezed states of atomic ensembles. It was shown by Sørensen and Mølmer (2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 022314) how an effective one-axis twisting Hamiltonian can be realized in a cavity setup. Here, we extend this work and show how an effective two-axis twisting Hamiltonian can be realized in a similar cavity setup. We compare the two schemes in order to characterize their advantages. In the absence of decoherence, the two-axis Hamiltonian leads to more squeezing than the one-axis Hamiltonian. If limited by decoherence from spontaneous emission and cavity decay, we find roughly the same level of squeezing for the two schemes scaling as where C is the single atom cooperativity and N is the total number of atoms. When compared to an ideal squeezing operation, we find that for specific initial states, a dissipative version of the one-axis scheme attains higher fidelity than the unitary one-axis scheme or the two-axis scheme. However, the unitary one-axis and two-axis schemes perform better for general initial states.
AB - The strong light-matter coupling attainable in optical cavities enables the generation of highly squeezed states of atomic ensembles. It was shown by Sørensen and Mølmer (2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 022314) how an effective one-axis twisting Hamiltonian can be realized in a cavity setup. Here, we extend this work and show how an effective two-axis twisting Hamiltonian can be realized in a similar cavity setup. We compare the two schemes in order to characterize their advantages. In the absence of decoherence, the two-axis Hamiltonian leads to more squeezing than the one-axis Hamiltonian. If limited by decoherence from spontaneous emission and cavity decay, we find roughly the same level of squeezing for the two schemes scaling as where C is the single atom cooperativity and N is the total number of atoms. When compared to an ideal squeezing operation, we find that for specific initial states, a dissipative version of the one-axis scheme attains higher fidelity than the unitary one-axis scheme or the two-axis scheme. However, the unitary one-axis and two-axis schemes perform better for general initial states.
U2 - 10.1088/1367-2630/aa8438
DO - 10.1088/1367-2630/aa8438
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1367-2630
VL - 19
JO - New Journal of Physics
JF - New Journal of Physics
M1 - 093021
ER -