Not Running Wild with the CISG

Joseph Lookofsky

Not Running Wild with the CISG

Abstract

Now in effect in more than 75 States, the Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) provides the contractual gap-filling regime for countless cross-border transactions each year. But prevalence is not necessarily a compelling success standard, and the Convention has been subjected to considerable criticism, not only because key treaty rules are susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, but also because courts and academics have adopted inconsistent positions on the very scope of the treaty: (e.g.) does the CISG regulate "hardship"? To illustrate the nature and complexity of such problems and the range of possible solutions, and to counter the positions taken by academics who adopt an "expansionist" approach, the author explores recent CISG decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Israel and the Cour de cassion of Belgium.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Law & Commerce
Vol/bind	29
Udgave nummer	2
Sider (fra-til)	141-169
Antal sider	29
ISSN	0733-2491
Status	Udgivet - 2011

Emneord

Det Juridiske Fakultet

Citationsformater

@article{1a45f823c6b948cbbf20cf1171de7c7e,

title = "Not Running Wild with the CISG",

abstract = "Now in effect in more than 75 States, the Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) provides the contractual gap-filling regime for countless cross-border transactions each year. But prevalence is not necessarily a compelling success standard, and the Convention has been subjected to considerable criticism, not only because key treaty rules are susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, but also because courts and academics have adopted inconsistent positions on the very scope of the treaty: (e.g.) does the CISG regulate {"}hardship{"}? To illustrate the nature and complexity of such problems and the range of possible solutions, and to counter the positions taken by academics who adopt an {"}expansionist{"} approach, the author explores recent CISG decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Israel and the Cour de cassion of Belgium.",

keywords = "Faculty of Law, international sales",

author = "Joseph Lookofsky",

year = "2011",

language = "English",

volume = "29",

pages = "141--169",

journal = "Journal of Law & Commerce",

issn = "0733-2491",

publisher = "University of Pittsburgh * University Library System",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not Running Wild with the CISG

AU - Lookofsky, Joseph

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Now in effect in more than 75 States, the Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) provides the contractual gap-filling regime for countless cross-border transactions each year. But prevalence is not necessarily a compelling success standard, and the Convention has been subjected to considerable criticism, not only because key treaty rules are susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, but also because courts and academics have adopted inconsistent positions on the very scope of the treaty: (e.g.) does the CISG regulate "hardship"? To illustrate the nature and complexity of such problems and the range of possible solutions, and to counter the positions taken by academics who adopt an "expansionist" approach, the author explores recent CISG decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Israel and the Cour de cassion of Belgium.

AB - Now in effect in more than 75 States, the Convention on Contracts for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) provides the contractual gap-filling regime for countless cross-border transactions each year. But prevalence is not necessarily a compelling success standard, and the Convention has been subjected to considerable criticism, not only because key treaty rules are susceptible to more than one reasonable interpretation, but also because courts and academics have adopted inconsistent positions on the very scope of the treaty: (e.g.) does the CISG regulate "hardship"? To illustrate the nature and complexity of such problems and the range of possible solutions, and to counter the positions taken by academics who adopt an "expansionist" approach, the author explores recent CISG decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Israel and the Cour de cassion of Belgium.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - international sales

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0733-2491

VL - 29

SP - 141

EP - 169

JO - Journal of Law & Commerce

JF - Journal of Law & Commerce

IS - 2

ER -

Not Running Wild with the CISG

Abstract

Emneord

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater