Non-invasive machine learning estimation of effort differentiates sleep-disordered breathing pathology

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-invasive machine learning estimation of effort differentiates sleep-disordered breathing pathology

AU - Hanif, Umaer

AU - Schneider, Logan D

AU - Trap, Lotte

AU - Leary, Eileen B

AU - Moore, Hyatt

AU - Guilleminault, Christian

AU - Jennum, Poul

AU - Sorensen, Helge B D

AU - Mignot, Emmanuel J M

PY - 2019/2/26

Y1 - 2019/2/26

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) events, unlike central events, are associated with increased respiratory effort. Esophageal pressure (P es) monitoring is the gold standard for measuring respiratory effort, but it is typically poorly tolerated because of its invasive nature. The objective was to investigate whether machine learning can be applied to routinely collected non-invasive, polysomnography (PSG) measures to accurately model peak negative P es.APPROACH: One thousand one hundred and nineteen patients from the Stanford Sleep Clinic with PSGs containing P es served as the sample. The selected non-invasive PSG signals included nasal pressure, oral airflow, thoracoabdominal effort, and snoring. A long short-term memory neural network was implemented to achieve a context-based mapping between the non-invasive features and the P es values. A hold-out dataset served as a prospective validation of the algorithm without needing to undertake a costly new study with the impractically invasive P es.MAIN RESULTS: The median difference between the measured and predicted P es was 0.61 cmH2O with an interquartile range (IQR) of 2.99 cmH2O and 5th and 95th percentiles of  -5.85 cmH2O and 5.47 cmH2O, respectively. The model performed well when compared to actual esophageal pressure signal (ρ median  =  0.581, p   =  0.01; IQR  =  0.298; ρ 5%  =  0.106; ρ 95%  =  0.843).SIGNIFICANCE: A significant difference in predicted P es was shown between normal breathing and all obstructive SDB events; whereas, central apneas did not significantly differ from normal breathing. The developed system may be used as a tool for quantifying respiratory effort from the existing clinical practice of PSG without the need for P es, improving characterization of SDB events as obstructive or not.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) events, unlike central events, are associated with increased respiratory effort. Esophageal pressure (P es) monitoring is the gold standard for measuring respiratory effort, but it is typically poorly tolerated because of its invasive nature. The objective was to investigate whether machine learning can be applied to routinely collected non-invasive, polysomnography (PSG) measures to accurately model peak negative P es.APPROACH: One thousand one hundred and nineteen patients from the Stanford Sleep Clinic with PSGs containing P es served as the sample. The selected non-invasive PSG signals included nasal pressure, oral airflow, thoracoabdominal effort, and snoring. A long short-term memory neural network was implemented to achieve a context-based mapping between the non-invasive features and the P es values. A hold-out dataset served as a prospective validation of the algorithm without needing to undertake a costly new study with the impractically invasive P es.MAIN RESULTS: The median difference between the measured and predicted P es was 0.61 cmH2O with an interquartile range (IQR) of 2.99 cmH2O and 5th and 95th percentiles of  -5.85 cmH2O and 5.47 cmH2O, respectively. The model performed well when compared to actual esophageal pressure signal (ρ median  =  0.581, p   =  0.01; IQR  =  0.298; ρ 5%  =  0.106; ρ 95%  =  0.843).SIGNIFICANCE: A significant difference in predicted P es was shown between normal breathing and all obstructive SDB events; whereas, central apneas did not significantly differ from normal breathing. The developed system may be used as a tool for quantifying respiratory effort from the existing clinical practice of PSG without the need for P es, improving characterization of SDB events as obstructive or not.

U2 - 10.1088/1361-6579/ab0559

DO - 10.1088/1361-6579/ab0559

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30736016

SN - 0967-3334

VL - 40

JO - Physiological Measurement

JF - Physiological Measurement

IS - 2

M1 - 025008

ER -