No welfare magnets – free movement and cross-border welfare in Germany and Denmark compared

Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen; Benjamin Werner

doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136

No welfare magnets – free movement and cross-border welfare in Germany and Denmark compared

Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, Benjamin Werner

Center for Europæisk Politik

8 Citationer (Scopus)

64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A ‘dually open’ free movement system has evolved in the European Union (EU), granting EU citizens the right to free movement within the Union as well as cross-border welfare rights. Some scholarly literature and public debates have characterised the system as corrosive to the nationally organised welfare state, which will become a ‘magnet’ for the European poor. This paper examines how the German and Danish welfare states have responded to the ‘dual open’ system and its outcomes in terms of EU citizens’ take-up rate of non-contributory benefits between 2007 and 2015. We show that the domestic responses were mostly restrictive and that outcomes remained rather stable. Our findings do not support the welfare magnet thesis but instead identify a tendency to a bifurcated social protection system for EU citizens in Germany.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of European Public Policy
Vol/bind	26
Udgave nummer	5
Sider (fra-til)	637-655
ISSN	1350-1763
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136
Status	Udgivet - 4 maj 2019

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136

Martinsen_Werner_No welfare magnets_finalAccepteret manuskript, 334 KB

Citationsformater

@article{6ea6a75804c44fdba95b1f2539989482,

title = "No welfare magnets – free movement and cross-border welfare in Germany and Denmark compared",

abstract = "A {\textquoteleft}dually open{\textquoteright} free movement system has evolved in the European Union (EU), granting EU citizens the right to free movement within the Union as well as cross-border welfare rights. Some scholarly literature and public debates have characterised the system as corrosive to the nationally organised welfare state, which will become a {\textquoteleft}magnet{\textquoteright} for the European poor. This paper examines how the German and Danish welfare states have responded to the {\textquoteleft}dual open{\textquoteright} system and its outcomes in terms of EU citizens{\textquoteright} take-up rate of non-contributory benefits between 2007 and 2015. We show that the domestic responses were mostly restrictive and that outcomes remained rather stable. Our findings do not support the welfare magnet thesis but instead identify a tendency to a bifurcated social protection system for EU citizens in Germany.",

author = "Martinsen, {Dorte Sindbjerg} and Benjamin Werner",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "4",

doi = "10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "637--655",

journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",

issn = "1350-1763",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No welfare magnets – free movement and cross-border welfare in Germany and Denmark compared

AU - Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg

AU - Werner, Benjamin

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - A ‘dually open’ free movement system has evolved in the European Union (EU), granting EU citizens the right to free movement within the Union as well as cross-border welfare rights. Some scholarly literature and public debates have characterised the system as corrosive to the nationally organised welfare state, which will become a ‘magnet’ for the European poor. This paper examines how the German and Danish welfare states have responded to the ‘dual open’ system and its outcomes in terms of EU citizens’ take-up rate of non-contributory benefits between 2007 and 2015. We show that the domestic responses were mostly restrictive and that outcomes remained rather stable. Our findings do not support the welfare magnet thesis but instead identify a tendency to a bifurcated social protection system for EU citizens in Germany.

AB - A ‘dually open’ free movement system has evolved in the European Union (EU), granting EU citizens the right to free movement within the Union as well as cross-border welfare rights. Some scholarly literature and public debates have characterised the system as corrosive to the nationally organised welfare state, which will become a ‘magnet’ for the European poor. This paper examines how the German and Danish welfare states have responded to the ‘dual open’ system and its outcomes in terms of EU citizens’ take-up rate of non-contributory benefits between 2007 and 2015. We show that the domestic responses were mostly restrictive and that outcomes remained rather stable. Our findings do not support the welfare magnet thesis but instead identify a tendency to a bifurcated social protection system for EU citizens in Germany.

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2018.1481136

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1350-1763

VL - 26

SP - 637

EP - 655

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

IS - 5

ER -

No welfare magnets – free movement and cross-border welfare in Germany and Denmark compared

Abstract

FN’s Verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater