Infection increases mortality in necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mikkel Werge, Srdjan Novovic, Palle N Schmidt, Lise L Gluud

48 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of infection on mortality in necrotizing pancreatitis.

METHODS: Eligible prospective and retrospective studies were identified through manual and electronic searches (August 2015). The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Meta-analyses were performed with subgroup, sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses to evaluate sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS: We included 71 studies (n = 6970 patients). Thirty-seven (52%) studies used a prospective design and 25 scored ≥5 points on the NOS suggesting a low risk of bias. Forty studies were descriptive and 31 studies evaluated invasive interventions. In total, 801 of 2842 patients (28%) with infected necroses and 537 of 4128 patients (13%) with sterile necroses died with an odds ratio [OR] of 2.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00-3.31) based on all studies and 2.02 (95%CI, 1.61-2.53) in the studies with the lowest bias risk. The OR for prospective studies was 2.96 (95%CI, 2.51-3.50). In sensitivity analyses excluding studies evaluating invasive interventions, the OR was 3.30 (95%CI, 2.81-3.88). Patients with infected necrosis and organ failure had a mortality of 35.2% while concomitant sterile necrosis and organ failure was associated with a mortality of 19.8%. If the patients had infected necrosis without organ failure the mortality was 1.4%.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients with necrotizing pancreatitis are more than twice as likely to die if the necrosis becomes infected. Both organ failure and infected necrosis increase mortality in necrotizing pancreatitis.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPancreatology
Vol/bind16
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)698-707
Antal sider10
ISSN1424-3903
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 sep. 2016

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Infection increases mortality in necrotizing pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater