Illiberalism, geopolitics, and middle power security: Lessons from the Norwegian case

Nina Graeger

doi:10.1177/0020702019834982

Illiberalism, geopolitics, and middle power security: Lessons from the Norwegian case

Abstract

Middle powers have played a key role in supporting global governance, a rules-based order, and human rights norms. Apart from conveying and effectuating global solidarity and responsibility, multilateral cooperation has been an arena where middle powers seek protection and leverage relatively modest power to greater effect, sometimes as “helpful fixers” to great powers. This article argues that geopolitical revival and the contestation of the liberal order are challenging middle powers' traditional sheltering policies, based on empirical evidence from the Norwegian case. First, the weakening of multilateral organizations is making middle powers more vulnerable to great power rivalry and geopolitics, and Norway's relationship with Russia is particularly pointed. Second, existing shelters such as NATO and bilateral cooperation with the US are negatively affected by the latter's anti-liberal foreign policies, making looser sheltering frameworks important supplements. While Norway's and other middle powers' traditional policies within the “soft power” belt may continue, “doing good” may become less prioritized, due to the need for security.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	International Journal
Vol/bind	74
Udgave nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	84-102
ISSN	0020-7020
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702019834982
Status	Udgivet - 1 mar. 2019
Udgivet eksternt	Ja

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1177/0020702019834982

0020702019834982Forlagets udgivne version, 239 KB

Citationsformater

@article{f054d106ced643eab35d015986afecac,

title = "Illiberalism, geopolitics, and middle power security: Lessons from the Norwegian case",

abstract = "Middle powers have played a key role in supporting global governance, a rules-based order, and human rights norms. Apart from conveying and effectuating global solidarity and responsibility, multilateral cooperation has been an arena where middle powers seek protection and leverage relatively modest power to greater effect, sometimes as “helpful fixers” to great powers. This article argues that geopolitical revival and the contestation of the liberal order are challenging middle powers' traditional sheltering policies, based on empirical evidence from the Norwegian case. First, the weakening of multilateral organizations is making middle powers more vulnerable to great power rivalry and geopolitics, and Norway's relationship with Russia is particularly pointed. Second, existing shelters such as NATO and bilateral cooperation with the US are negatively affected by the latter's anti-liberal foreign policies, making looser sheltering frameworks important supplements. While Norway's and other middle powers' traditional policies within the “soft power” belt may continue, “doing good” may become less prioritized, due to the need for security.",

keywords = "Security, middle powers, geopolitics, liberal order, Norway, multilateral organizations",

author = "Nina Graeger",

year = "2019",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0020702019834982",

language = "English",

volume = "74",

pages = "84--102",

journal = "International Journal",

issn = "0020-7020",

publisher = "SAGE Publications",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Illiberalism, geopolitics, and middle power security: Lessons from the Norwegian case

AU - Graeger, Nina

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Middle powers have played a key role in supporting global governance, a rules-based order, and human rights norms. Apart from conveying and effectuating global solidarity and responsibility, multilateral cooperation has been an arena where middle powers seek protection and leverage relatively modest power to greater effect, sometimes as “helpful fixers” to great powers. This article argues that geopolitical revival and the contestation of the liberal order are challenging middle powers' traditional sheltering policies, based on empirical evidence from the Norwegian case. First, the weakening of multilateral organizations is making middle powers more vulnerable to great power rivalry and geopolitics, and Norway's relationship with Russia is particularly pointed. Second, existing shelters such as NATO and bilateral cooperation with the US are negatively affected by the latter's anti-liberal foreign policies, making looser sheltering frameworks important supplements. While Norway's and other middle powers' traditional policies within the “soft power” belt may continue, “doing good” may become less prioritized, due to the need for security.

AB - Middle powers have played a key role in supporting global governance, a rules-based order, and human rights norms. Apart from conveying and effectuating global solidarity and responsibility, multilateral cooperation has been an arena where middle powers seek protection and leverage relatively modest power to greater effect, sometimes as “helpful fixers” to great powers. This article argues that geopolitical revival and the contestation of the liberal order are challenging middle powers' traditional sheltering policies, based on empirical evidence from the Norwegian case. First, the weakening of multilateral organizations is making middle powers more vulnerable to great power rivalry and geopolitics, and Norway's relationship with Russia is particularly pointed. Second, existing shelters such as NATO and bilateral cooperation with the US are negatively affected by the latter's anti-liberal foreign policies, making looser sheltering frameworks important supplements. While Norway's and other middle powers' traditional policies within the “soft power” belt may continue, “doing good” may become less prioritized, due to the need for security.

KW - Security

KW - middle powers

KW - geopolitics

KW - liberal order

KW - Norway

KW - multilateral organizations

U2 - 10.1177/0020702019834982

DO - 10.1177/0020702019834982

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0020-7020

VL - 74

SP - 84

EP - 102

JO - International Journal

JF - International Journal

IS - 1

ER -

Illiberalism, geopolitics, and middle power security: Lessons from the Norwegian case

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater