TY - JOUR
T1 - Historic transfer of forest reproductive material in the Nordic region
T2 - Drivers, scale and implications
AU - Myking, Tor
AU - Rusanen, Mari
AU - Steffenrem, Arne
AU - Kjær, Erik Dahl
AU - Jansson, Gunnar
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - Large-scale transfer of reproductive material is a common phenomenon in forestry and is not only limited to recent history. Here we review the historical transfer of forest reproductive material (FRM) in Fennoscandia, the directions, their drivers, and the reported consequences for adaptation and gene pools of key forest tree species. We find that large imports of non-native FRM occurred from the 19th century onwards, partly due to prior deforestations directly associated with charcoal production for mining, extraction of timber and production of tar and pitch which have historically been important export commodities for Sweden, Norway, and Finland. In Denmark, conversion to agricultural land and the use of forests for livestock feeding was similarly important. During the subsequent reforestation efforts in Denmark, the introduction and use of non-autochthonous FRM of beech, oak and Scots pine became prevalent. Norway spruce FRM was extensively introduced to Sweden and Norway, and Scots pine FRM was imported to Sweden. Finland, in contrast, has limited records of FRM introductions. The importation of conifer seed to Norway and Sweden was initially driven by demand for large quantities of seed associated with the practice of direct seeding which prevailed until the mid-20th century. Large-scale changes to land ownership appear to have facilitated the logging of forests and subsequent seed imports for regeneration. Awareness of provenance variation in adaptive traits emerged gradually from the 19th century and led to more targeted imports of FRM to specifically improve climatic adaptation, trait qualities and growth, from the early 20th century. This, in turn, triggered the development of national regulations and guidelines from the 1930s to control the use of FRM, and marked a shift in forest legislation that had historically only been designed to control harvesting. Due to the geographical scales involved, transfers of FRM have unquestionably affected native gene pools, especially for species such as Norway spruce, Scots pine, beech, sessile and pedunculate oak, although relatively few examples of adaptive failures due to transfer have been reported.
AB - Large-scale transfer of reproductive material is a common phenomenon in forestry and is not only limited to recent history. Here we review the historical transfer of forest reproductive material (FRM) in Fennoscandia, the directions, their drivers, and the reported consequences for adaptation and gene pools of key forest tree species. We find that large imports of non-native FRM occurred from the 19th century onwards, partly due to prior deforestations directly associated with charcoal production for mining, extraction of timber and production of tar and pitch which have historically been important export commodities for Sweden, Norway, and Finland. In Denmark, conversion to agricultural land and the use of forests for livestock feeding was similarly important. During the subsequent reforestation efforts in Denmark, the introduction and use of non-autochthonous FRM of beech, oak and Scots pine became prevalent. Norway spruce FRM was extensively introduced to Sweden and Norway, and Scots pine FRM was imported to Sweden. Finland, in contrast, has limited records of FRM introductions. The importation of conifer seed to Norway and Sweden was initially driven by demand for large quantities of seed associated with the practice of direct seeding which prevailed until the mid-20th century. Large-scale changes to land ownership appear to have facilitated the logging of forests and subsequent seed imports for regeneration. Awareness of provenance variation in adaptive traits emerged gradually from the 19th century and led to more targeted imports of FRM to specifically improve climatic adaptation, trait qualities and growth, from the early 20th century. This, in turn, triggered the development of national regulations and guidelines from the 1930s to control the use of FRM, and marked a shift in forest legislation that had historically only been designed to control harvesting. Due to the geographical scales involved, transfers of FRM have unquestionably affected native gene pools, especially for species such as Norway spruce, Scots pine, beech, sessile and pedunculate oak, although relatively few examples of adaptive failures due to transfer have been reported.
KW - adaptation
KW - autochthonous species
KW - forest trees
KW - FRM
KW - gene pool
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984838224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/forestry/cpw020
DO - 10.1093/forestry/cpw020
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:84984838224
SN - 0015-752X
VL - 89
SP - 325
EP - 337
JO - Forestry
JF - Forestry
IS - 4
ER -
