High inter-rater reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of Constant score in patients with clavicle fractures

Ilija Ban; Anders Troelsen; Morten Tange Kristensen

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.022

High inter-rater reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of Constant score in patients with clavicle fractures

Ilija Ban, Anders Troelsen, Morten Tange Kristensen

Institut for Klinisk Medicin

9 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Constant score (CS) has been the primary endpoint in most studies on clavicle fractures. However, the CS was not developed to assess patients with clavicle fractures. Our aim was to examine inter-rater reliability and agreement of the CS in patients with clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to estimate the correlation between the CS and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the internal consistency of the 2 scores.

METHODS: On the basis of sample sizing, 36 patients (31 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 41.3 years) with clavicle fractures underwent standardized CS assessment at a mean of 6.8 weeks (SD, 1.0 weeks) after injury. Reliability and agreement of the CS were determined by 2 raters. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, Cronbach α coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient were estimated.

RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the total CS was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97), with no systematic difference between the 2 raters (P = .75). The standard error of measurement (measurement error at the group level) was 4.9, whereas the minimal detectable change (smallest change needed to indicate a real change for an individual) was 13.6 CS points. The internal consistency of the 10 CS items was good, with a Cronbach α of .85, and we found a strong correlation (r = -0.92) between the CS and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.

CONCLUSIONS: The CS was found to be reliable for assessing patients with clavicle fractures, especially at the group level. With high inter-rater reliability and agreement, in addition to good internal consistency, the standardized CS used in this study can be used for comparison of results from different settings.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Vol/bind	25
Udgave nummer	10
Sider (fra-til)	1577-82
Antal sider	6
ISSN	1058-2746
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.022
Status	Udgivet - 1 okt. 2016

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.022

Citationsformater

@article{7ec13e6017c145cda83f0a0fd312929b,

title = "High inter-rater reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of Constant score in patients with clavicle fractures",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: The Constant score (CS) has been the primary endpoint in most studies on clavicle fractures. However, the CS was not developed to assess patients with clavicle fractures. Our aim was to examine inter-rater reliability and agreement of the CS in patients with clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to estimate the correlation between the CS and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the internal consistency of the 2 scores.METHODS: On the basis of sample sizing, 36 patients (31 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 41.3 years) with clavicle fractures underwent standardized CS assessment at a mean of 6.8 weeks (SD, 1.0 weeks) after injury. Reliability and agreement of the CS were determined by 2 raters. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, Cronbach α coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient were estimated.RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the total CS was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97), with no systematic difference between the 2 raters (P = .75). The standard error of measurement (measurement error at the group level) was 4.9, whereas the minimal detectable change (smallest change needed to indicate a real change for an individual) was 13.6 CS points. The internal consistency of the 10 CS items was good, with a Cronbach α of .85, and we found a strong correlation (r = -0.92) between the CS and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.CONCLUSIONS: The CS was found to be reliable for assessing patients with clavicle fractures, especially at the group level. With high inter-rater reliability and agreement, in addition to good internal consistency, the standardized CS used in this study can be used for comparison of results from different settings.",

keywords = "Adult, Clavicle, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disability Evaluation, Female, Fractures, Bone, Humans, Male, Muscle Strength, Patient Outcome Assessment, Prospective Studies, Reproducibility of Results, Visual Analog Scale, Journal Article, Validation Studies",

author = "Ilija Ban and Anders Troelsen and Kristensen, {Morten Tange}",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.022",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "1577--82",

journal = "Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery",

issn = "1058-2746",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High inter-rater reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of Constant score in patients with clavicle fractures

AU - Ban, Ilija

AU - Troelsen, Anders

AU - Kristensen, Morten Tange

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Constant score (CS) has been the primary endpoint in most studies on clavicle fractures. However, the CS was not developed to assess patients with clavicle fractures. Our aim was to examine inter-rater reliability and agreement of the CS in patients with clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to estimate the correlation between the CS and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the internal consistency of the 2 scores.METHODS: On the basis of sample sizing, 36 patients (31 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 41.3 years) with clavicle fractures underwent standardized CS assessment at a mean of 6.8 weeks (SD, 1.0 weeks) after injury. Reliability and agreement of the CS were determined by 2 raters. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, Cronbach α coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient were estimated.RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the total CS was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97), with no systematic difference between the 2 raters (P = .75). The standard error of measurement (measurement error at the group level) was 4.9, whereas the minimal detectable change (smallest change needed to indicate a real change for an individual) was 13.6 CS points. The internal consistency of the 10 CS items was good, with a Cronbach α of .85, and we found a strong correlation (r = -0.92) between the CS and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.CONCLUSIONS: The CS was found to be reliable for assessing patients with clavicle fractures, especially at the group level. With high inter-rater reliability and agreement, in addition to good internal consistency, the standardized CS used in this study can be used for comparison of results from different settings.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Constant score (CS) has been the primary endpoint in most studies on clavicle fractures. However, the CS was not developed to assess patients with clavicle fractures. Our aim was to examine inter-rater reliability and agreement of the CS in patients with clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to estimate the correlation between the CS and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and the internal consistency of the 2 scores.METHODS: On the basis of sample sizing, 36 patients (31 male and 5 female patients; mean age, 41.3 years) with clavicle fractures underwent standardized CS assessment at a mean of 6.8 weeks (SD, 1.0 weeks) after injury. Reliability and agreement of the CS were determined by 2 raters. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1), standard error of measurement, minimal detectable change, Cronbach α coefficient, and Pearson correlation coefficient were estimated.RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability of the total CS was excellent (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.97), with no systematic difference between the 2 raters (P = .75). The standard error of measurement (measurement error at the group level) was 4.9, whereas the minimal detectable change (smallest change needed to indicate a real change for an individual) was 13.6 CS points. The internal consistency of the 10 CS items was good, with a Cronbach α of .85, and we found a strong correlation (r = -0.92) between the CS and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.CONCLUSIONS: The CS was found to be reliable for assessing patients with clavicle fractures, especially at the group level. With high inter-rater reliability and agreement, in addition to good internal consistency, the standardized CS used in this study can be used for comparison of results from different settings.

KW - Adult

KW - Clavicle

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Disability Evaluation

KW - Female

KW - Fractures, Bone

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Muscle Strength

KW - Patient Outcome Assessment

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Visual Analog Scale

KW - Journal Article

KW - Validation Studies

U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.022

DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.022

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27106115

SN - 1058-2746

VL - 25

SP - 1577

EP - 1582

JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

IS - 10

ER -

High inter-rater reliability, agreement, and convergent validity of Constant score in patients with clavicle fractures

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater