Hegel’s Historical Methodology in The Concept of Irony

Jon Bartley Stewart

4 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Kierkegaard's remarks in the Introduction to The Concept of Irony have proven to be difficult to understand. There he gives a somewhat odd general methodological consideration of the relation between philosophy and history in order to explain his own procedure in exploring irony in different historical contexts. This paper claims that his elusive comments here make sense when read against the background of Hegel's famous introduction to the Lectures on the Philosophy of History. While Kierkegaard is known for his passionate criticism of the abstraction of speculative philosophy, here, by contrast, he seems to affirm his appreciation for speculative philosophy's ability to avoid abstraction and capture the truth of actuality. Thus, in his methodological considerations at the outset of the work, he seems to say that he will attempt a kind of Hegelian philosophy of history as he traces the historical mutations of the concept of irony.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelKierkegaard Studies : Yearbook
RedaktørerHeiko Schulz, Jon Steward
Antal sider19
Vol/bind2011
ForlagDe Gruyter
Publikationsdato16 nov. 2011
Sider81-100
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-11-023650-7
StatusUdgivet - 16 nov. 2011
NavnKierkegaard Studies Yearbook
Vol/bind2011
ISSN1430-5372

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Hegel’s Historical Methodology in The Concept of Irony'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater