G.C. Oeder's conflict with Linnaeus and the implementation of taxonomic and nomenclatural ideas in the monumantal Flora Danica project

    Abstract

    Hitherto unpublished parts of the history of the Icones … Florae Danicae
    (1761–1883), one of the largest illustrated botanical works published, are analysed; it covered
    the entire flora of the double monarchy of Denmark–Norway, Schleswig and Holstein and
    the North Atlantic dependencies. A study of the little noticed taxonomic and nomenclatural
    principles behind the Icones is presented. G.C. Oeder, founder of the project, approved the
    ideas of Buffon and Haller and rejected Linnaean binary nomenclature because of its lack of
    stability of genera. In the Icones …, Oeder cited all names used for each plant in chronological
    order, with the binary Linnaean name last, to which principle Linnaeus reacted. By the end of
    the 18th century, Linnaean nomenclature had become standard, apart from in Flora Danica and
    a very few other botanical works. Applying Linnaean nomenclature elsewhere, O.F. Müller,
    editor 1775–1782, and M. Vahl, editor 1787–1799, followed Oeder’s norm in the Icones. J.W.
    Hornemann, editor 1810–1840, followed Oeder in his first fascicles, but began experimenting
    with changes towards Linnaean nomenclature from 1810. After 1840, subsequent editors
    consistently applied Linnaean principles for accepted names and synonyms.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftGardens' Bulletin, Singapore
    Vol/bind71
    Udgave nummer(Supplement 2
    Sider (fra-til)53-85
    ISSN0374-7859
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 27 sep. 2019

    Emneord

    • Det Natur- og Biovidenskabelige Fakultet

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'G.C. Oeder's conflict with Linnaeus and the implementation of taxonomic and nomenclatural ideas in the monumantal Flora Danica project'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater