Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations

Marianne Gauffriau; Peder Olesen Larsen

Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations

3 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	Proceedings of ISSI 2005 : : 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics
Antal sider	5
Vol/bind	1
Publikationsdato	2005
Sider	242-246
ISBN (Trykt)	9789171403391
Status	Udgivet - 2005
Udgivet eksternt	Ja
Begivenhed	10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005 - Stockholm, Sverige Varighed: 24 jul. 2005 → 28 jul. 2005

Konference

Konference	10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005
Land/Område	Sverige
By	Stockholm
Periode	24/07/2005 → 28/07/2005
Sponsor	The Swedish Research Council, VINNOVA, Karolinska insititute, Umeå University, Eugene Garfield foundation, et al, VINNOVA, Umea university

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations. / Gauffriau, Marianne; Larsen, Peder Olesen.

Proceedings of ISSI 2005: : 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. Bind 1 2005. s. 242-246.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › peer review

Gauffriau, M & Larsen, PO 2005, Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations. i Proceedings of ISSI 2005: : 10th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics. bind 1, s. 242-246, 10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005, Stockholm, Sverige, 24/07/2005.

@inproceedings{3d54588327ce4ad1b8772eaf56dca75a,

title = "Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations",

abstract = "For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.",

author = "Marianne Gauffriau and Larsen, {Peder Olesen}",

year = "2005",

language = "English",

isbn = "9789171403391",

volume = "1",

pages = "242--246",

booktitle = "Proceedings of ISSI 2005",

note = "10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005 ; Conference date: 24-07-2005 Through 28-07-2005",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations

AU - Gauffriau, Marianne

AU - Larsen, Peder Olesen

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.

AB - For all rankings of countries research output based on number of publications, citations or most cited publications compared with population, GDP, R&D expenses and other national characteristics the counting method is decisive. Using data freely available the difference between numbers of publications based on Total Counting and Fractional Counting has been quantified. Reduction in numbers of publications going from Total to Fractional Counting ranges from 10 to 45 per cent for different countries. Rankings based on numbers of citations or highly cited papers most likely are even more dependent on the counting method used. Counting methods are in many cases not precisely described or discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55049141992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article in proceedings

AN - SCOPUS:55049141992

SN - 9789171403391

VL - 1

SP - 242

EP - 246

BT - Proceedings of ISSI 2005

T2 - 10th Biennial International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2005

Y2 - 24 July 2005 through 28 July 2005

ER -

Different outcomes of different counting methods for publications and citations

Abstract

Konference

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater