Different Aspects of Transparency in Digital Government: the Danish Case

Ayo Næsborg-Andersen; Hanne Marie Motzfeldt

Different Aspects of Transparency in Digital Government: the Danish Case

Ayo Næsborg-Andersen, Hanne Marie Motzfeldt

CIIR - Center for Informations- og innovationsret

Abstract

The public sector in Denmark is the most digitized in the world. Recent years have, however, shown that transparency is challenged, and public debate has exploded. The focus has in many ways been on a lack of transparency, but the public debate has been muddled by a lack of clarity on what the term means. This paper identifies four different aspects of transparency when it comes to digital government. This is transparency of algorithms, and of data, as well as of the decision processes when digitalization and development are initiated. The latter can be divided into transparency of administrative decisions, and of democratic debate. The democratic transparency has been sorely lacking in Denmark leading to a significant democratic deficit in digital government. This is due to very low transparency when decisions on digitization measures are presented for the democratic elected representatives. The latter in particular calls for more research, since lack of democratic transparency poses a danger to the stability of democratic societies.

Originalsprog	Dansk
Publikationsdato	25 okt. 2019
Status	Udgivet - 25 okt. 2019
Begivenhed	ECDG 2019 : 19th European Conference on Digital Government - Cyprus International University, Italien Varighed: 24 okt. 2019 → 25 okt. 2019 https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/ecdg/

Konference

Konference	ECDG 2019 : 19th European Conference on Digital Government
Lokation	Cyprus International University
Land/Område	Italien
Periode	24/10/2019 → 25/10/2019
Internetadresse	https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/ecdg/

Citationsformater

@conference{bef650bdc5a641a08011b5f0dce1e784,

title = "Different Aspects of Transparency in Digital Government: the Danish Case",

abstract = "The public sector in Denmark is the most digitized in the world. Recent years have, however, shown that transparency is challenged, and public debate has exploded. The focus has in many ways been on a lack of transparency, but the public debate has been muddled by a lack of clarity on what the term means. This paper identifies four different aspects of transparency when it comes to digital government. This is transparency of algorithms, and of data, as well as of the decision processes when digitalization and development are initiated. The latter can be divided into transparency of administrative decisions, and of democratic debate. The democratic transparency has been sorely lacking in Denmark leading to a significant democratic deficit in digital government. This is due to very low transparency when decisions on digitization measures are presented for the democratic elected representatives. The latter in particular calls for more research, since lack of democratic transparency poses a danger to the stability of democratic societies.",

author = "Ayo N{\ae}sborg-Andersen and Motzfeldt, {Hanne Marie}",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

day = "25",

language = "Dansk",

note = "ECDG 2019 : 19th European Conference on Digital Government ; Conference date: 24-10-2019 Through 25-10-2019",

url = "https://www.academic-conferences.org/conferences/ecdg/",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Different Aspects of Transparency in Digital Government

T2 - ECDG 2019 : 19th European Conference on Digital Government

AU - Næsborg-Andersen, Ayo

AU - Motzfeldt, Hanne Marie

PY - 2019/10/25

Y1 - 2019/10/25

N2 - The public sector in Denmark is the most digitized in the world. Recent years have, however, shown that transparency is challenged, and public debate has exploded. The focus has in many ways been on a lack of transparency, but the public debate has been muddled by a lack of clarity on what the term means. This paper identifies four different aspects of transparency when it comes to digital government. This is transparency of algorithms, and of data, as well as of the decision processes when digitalization and development are initiated. The latter can be divided into transparency of administrative decisions, and of democratic debate. The democratic transparency has been sorely lacking in Denmark leading to a significant democratic deficit in digital government. This is due to very low transparency when decisions on digitization measures are presented for the democratic elected representatives. The latter in particular calls for more research, since lack of democratic transparency poses a danger to the stability of democratic societies.

AB - The public sector in Denmark is the most digitized in the world. Recent years have, however, shown that transparency is challenged, and public debate has exploded. The focus has in many ways been on a lack of transparency, but the public debate has been muddled by a lack of clarity on what the term means. This paper identifies four different aspects of transparency when it comes to digital government. This is transparency of algorithms, and of data, as well as of the decision processes when digitalization and development are initiated. The latter can be divided into transparency of administrative decisions, and of democratic debate. The democratic transparency has been sorely lacking in Denmark leading to a significant democratic deficit in digital government. This is due to very low transparency when decisions on digitization measures are presented for the democratic elected representatives. The latter in particular calls for more research, since lack of democratic transparency poses a danger to the stability of democratic societies.

M3 - Paper

Y2 - 24 October 2019 through 25 October 2019

ER -