TY - JOUR
T1 - Current patch test results with the European baseline series and extensions to it from the 'European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy' network, 2007-2008
AU - Uter, Wolfgang
AU - Aberer, Werner
AU - Armario-Hita, José Carlos
AU - Fernandez-Vozmediano, José M
AU - Ayala, Fabio
AU - Balato, Anna
AU - Bauer, Andrea
AU - Ballmer-Weber, Barbara
AU - Beliauskiene, Aiste
AU - Fortina, Anna Belloni
AU - Bircher, Andreas
AU - Brasch, Jochen
AU - Chowdhury, Mahbub M U
AU - Coenraads, Pieter-Jan
AU - Schuttelaar, Marie-Louise
AU - Cooper, Sue
AU - Czarnecka-Operacz, Magda
AU - Zmudzinska, Maria
AU - Elsner, Peter
AU - English, John S C
AU - Frosch, Peter J
AU - Fuchs, Thomas
AU - García-Gavín, Juan
AU - Fernández-Redondo, Virginia
AU - Gawkrodger, David J
AU - Giménez-Arnau, Ana
AU - Green, Cathy M
AU - Horne, Helen L
AU - Johansen, Jeanne Duus
AU - Jolanki, Riitta
AU - Pesonen, Sini Maria Aliina
AU - King, Clodagh M
AU - Krêcisz, Beata
AU - Chomiczewska, Dorota
AU - Kiec-Swierczynska, Marta
AU - Larese, Francesca
AU - Mahler, Vera
AU - Ormerod, Anthony D
AU - Peserico, Andrea
AU - Rantanen, Tapio
AU - Rustemeyer, Thomas
AU - Sánchez-Pérez, Javier
AU - Sansom, Jane E
AU - Silvestre, Juan Fco
AU - Simon, Dagmar
AU - Spiewak, Radoslaw
AU - Statham, Barry N
AU - Stone, Natalie
AU - Wilkinson, Mark
AU - Schnuch, Axel
N1 - © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
PY - 2012/7
Y1 - 2012/7
N2 - Background. The pattern of contact sensitization to the supposedly most important allergens assembled in the baseline series differs between countries, presumably at least partly because of exposure differences. Objectives. To describe the prevalence of contact sensitization to allergens tested in consecutive patients in the years 2007 and 2008, and to discuss possible differences. Methods. Data from the 39 departments in 11 European countries comprising the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network () in this period have been pooled and analysed according to common standards. Results. Patch test results with the European baseline series, and country-specific or department-specific additions to it, obtained in 25 181 patients, showed marked international variation. Metals and fragrances are still the most frequent allergens across Europe. Some allergens tested nationally may be useful future additions to the European baseline series, for example methylisothiazolinone, whereas a few long-term components of the European baseline series, namely primin and clioquinol, no longer warrant routine testing. Conclusions. The present analysis points to 'excess' prevalences of specific contact sensitization in some countries, although interpretation must be cautious if only few, and possibly specialized, centres are representing one country. A comparison as presented may help to target in-depth research into possible causes of 'excess' exposure, and/or consideration of methodological issues, including modifications to the baseline series.
AB - Background. The pattern of contact sensitization to the supposedly most important allergens assembled in the baseline series differs between countries, presumably at least partly because of exposure differences. Objectives. To describe the prevalence of contact sensitization to allergens tested in consecutive patients in the years 2007 and 2008, and to discuss possible differences. Methods. Data from the 39 departments in 11 European countries comprising the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy network () in this period have been pooled and analysed according to common standards. Results. Patch test results with the European baseline series, and country-specific or department-specific additions to it, obtained in 25 181 patients, showed marked international variation. Metals and fragrances are still the most frequent allergens across Europe. Some allergens tested nationally may be useful future additions to the European baseline series, for example methylisothiazolinone, whereas a few long-term components of the European baseline series, namely primin and clioquinol, no longer warrant routine testing. Conclusions. The present analysis points to 'excess' prevalences of specific contact sensitization in some countries, although interpretation must be cautious if only few, and possibly specialized, centres are representing one country. A comparison as presented may help to target in-depth research into possible causes of 'excess' exposure, and/or consideration of methodological issues, including modifications to the baseline series.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02070.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02070.x
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 22500724
SN - 0105-1873
VL - 67
SP - 9
EP - 19
JO - Contact Dermatitis
JF - Contact Dermatitis
IS - 1
ER -