Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet

Jan Komárek

Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet

Centre of Excellence for International Courts and Governance

2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

In this short reply to the article by Mark Tushnet, "Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power," I seek to explain why I do not find Tushnet's account of constituent power and unconstitutional amendments very helpful in our understanding of both the underlying theoretical controversies and actual constitutional transformations.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	International Journal of Constitutional Law
Vol/bind	13
Udgave nummer	4
ISSN	1474-2640
Status	Udgivet - 1 okt. 2015

Citationsformater

@article{a98f8727b5984cb791fe2efbed3419c2,

title = "Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet",

abstract = "In this short reply to the article by Mark Tushnet, {"}Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power,{"} I seek to explain why I do not find Tushnet's account of constituent power and unconstitutional amendments very helpful in our understanding of both the underlying theoretical controversies and actual constitutional transformations.",

author = "Jan Kom{\'a}rek",

year = "2015",

month = oct,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

journal = "International Journal of Constitutional Law",

issn = "1474-2640",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet

AU - Komárek, Jan

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - In this short reply to the article by Mark Tushnet, "Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power," I seek to explain why I do not find Tushnet's account of constituent power and unconstitutional amendments very helpful in our understanding of both the underlying theoretical controversies and actual constitutional transformations.

AB - In this short reply to the article by Mark Tushnet, "Peasants with Pitchforks, and Toilers with Twitter: Constitutional Revolutions and the Constituent Power," I seek to explain why I do not find Tushnet's account of constituent power and unconstitutional amendments very helpful in our understanding of both the underlying theoretical controversies and actual constitutional transformations.

M3 - Comment/debate

SN - 1474-2640

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Constitutional Law

JF - International Journal of Constitutional Law

IS - 4

ER -

Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power: A reply to Mark Tushnet

Abstract

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater