Abstract
I argue against various versions of the 'attitude' view of consent and of the 'action' view of consent: I show that neither an attitude nor an action is either necessary or sufficient for consent. I then put forward a different view of consent based on the idea that, given a legitimate epistemic context, absence of dissent is sufficient for consent: what is crucial is having access to dissent. In the latter part of the paper I illustrate my view of consent by applying it to the case of consenting to being an organ donor.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Monash Bioethics Review |
Vol/bind | 34 |
Udgave nummer | 1 |
Sider (fra-til) | 3-22 |
Antal sider | 20 |
ISSN | 1321-2753 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - 1 mar. 2016 |