Cognitive foundations of topic-comment and foreground-background structures: Evidence from sign languages, cospeech gesture and homesign

4 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Krifka (2006, 2007b) suggests that asymmetric bimanual coordination and ultimately the evolution of lateralization in humans may be the cognitive basis of linguistic topic-comment structure and foreground-background structures in general. As asymmetric bimanual constructions abound in sign languages and are also found in their possible precursors, cospeech gesture and homesign, sign languages may serve as a test ground for the hypothesis. Asymmetric bimanual constructions are indeed used for differentiating foreground and background in sign languages, but some of these constructions are derived from indexical gestures, not manipulation, i.e., they draw on visual attention. Signed topics may be marked by nonmanual features derived from signals of visual attention, and the defining feature of signed topics is eye contact with the addressee, needed to establish a communicative common ground. There, thus, seems to be not one embodied origin of topic-comment structures, but several. Finally, signed topic-comment structure demonstrates how attention shifts in the course of the entire structure, thereby explaining how topics can be described alternately as foreground (e.g., Talmy 2007: 265) and background (Jacobs 2001).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftCognitive Linguistics
Vol/bind22
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)691-718
Antal sider28
ISSN0936-5907
DOI
StatusUdgivet - nov. 2011

Emneord

  • Det Humanistiske Fakultet
  • tegnsprog
  • Informationsstruktur
  • gestus
  • topic

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Cognitive foundations of topic-comment and foreground-background structures: Evidence from sign languages, cospeech gesture and homesign'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater