Caring for Participation in STS: from empowered patients to Ghostbusters

Karen Dam Nielsen

Caring for Participation in STS: from empowered patients to Ghostbusters

Karen Dam Nielsen

Datalogisk Institut

Abstract

In this short report from the EASST Conference 2014, I sketch a handful of presentations that engaged with ‘participation’. Two tracks, in particular, offered interesting analyses and conceptual experiments. The first track contained primarily empirically driven studies of ‘technologies of participation’ in (health) care and provided illustrations of the conceptual ambiguities and empirical implications that continue to make participation a problematic, yet highly relevant and intriguing STS-topic. The second track featured presentations that more explicitly contributed new analytical tools for studying participation - primarily aimed at studies of public participation in deliberative processes, yet of potential relevance for studies of seemingly more ‘private’/less ‘political’ forms of participation.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	EASST Review
Vol/bind	34
Udgave nummer	2
Status	Udgivet - 2015

Adgang til dokumentet

https://easst.net/article/caring-for-participation-in-sts-from-empowered-patients-to-ghostbusters/

Citationsformater

@article{efddbd64a3884addaef91af65f577efb,

title = "Caring for Participation in STS: from empowered patients to Ghostbusters",

abstract = "In this short report from the EASST Conference 2014, I sketch a handful of presentations that engaged with {\textquoteleft}participation{\textquoteright}. Two tracks, in particular, offered interesting analyses and conceptual experiments. The first track contained primarily empirically driven studies of {\textquoteleft}technologies of participation{\textquoteright} in (health) care and provided illustrations of the conceptual ambiguities and empirical implications that continue to make participation a problematic, yet highly relevant and intriguing STS-topic. The second track featured presentations that more explicitly contributed new analytical tools for studying participation - primarily aimed at studies of public participation in deliberative processes, yet of potential relevance for studies of seemingly more {\textquoteleft}private{\textquoteright}/less {\textquoteleft}political{\textquoteright} forms of participation.",

author = "Nielsen, {Karen Dam}",

year = "2015",

language = "English",

volume = "34",

journal = "EASST Review",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Caring for Participation in STS

T2 - from empowered patients to Ghostbusters

AU - Nielsen, Karen Dam

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In this short report from the EASST Conference 2014, I sketch a handful of presentations that engaged with ‘participation’. Two tracks, in particular, offered interesting analyses and conceptual experiments. The first track contained primarily empirically driven studies of ‘technologies of participation’ in (health) care and provided illustrations of the conceptual ambiguities and empirical implications that continue to make participation a problematic, yet highly relevant and intriguing STS-topic. The second track featured presentations that more explicitly contributed new analytical tools for studying participation - primarily aimed at studies of public participation in deliberative processes, yet of potential relevance for studies of seemingly more ‘private’/less ‘political’ forms of participation.

AB - In this short report from the EASST Conference 2014, I sketch a handful of presentations that engaged with ‘participation’. Two tracks, in particular, offered interesting analyses and conceptual experiments. The first track contained primarily empirically driven studies of ‘technologies of participation’ in (health) care and provided illustrations of the conceptual ambiguities and empirical implications that continue to make participation a problematic, yet highly relevant and intriguing STS-topic. The second track featured presentations that more explicitly contributed new analytical tools for studying participation - primarily aimed at studies of public participation in deliberative processes, yet of potential relevance for studies of seemingly more ‘private’/less ‘political’ forms of participation.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

JO - EASST Review

JF - EASST Review

IS - 2

ER -