TY - JOUR
T1 - Capecitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site
AU - Møller, Anne Kirstine Hundahl
AU - Pedersen, Karen Damgaard
AU - Abildgaard, Julie Rafn
AU - Petersen, Bodil Laub
AU - Daugaard, Gedske
PY - 2010/5/1
Y1 - 2010/5/1
N2 - Background. Treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) remains a challenge, and no effective second-line treatment has been identified. In CUP patients who are non-responsive or relapse early after first-line platinum/taxane-based regimens, it is likely that gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumours may be overrepresented. These patients could be candidates for GI tract-directed therapy. We here report the results obtained with oxaliplatin and capecitabine as second-line therapy in 25 recurrent/refractory CUP patients following first-line treatment with paclitaxel, cisplatin and gemcitabine. Patients and methods. Patients received capecitabine orally (1000 mg/m2) twice daily, days 114, and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) intravenously on day 1 in a three-week schedule. Results. Twenty-five CUP patients received a median of three cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment. Histopathological assessments suggested the primary site to be of GI tract origin in the majority of the patients (76%). We found an objective response rate of 13%, a median progression-free survival and overall survival rate of 2.3 and 3.9 months, respectively, and 32% of patients alive at one year after initiation of second-line therapy. The regimen was well tolerated by most patients. Conclusions. This study, demonstrates that there is still a significant need for improved second-line therapy in CUP patients.
AB - Background. Treatment of patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) remains a challenge, and no effective second-line treatment has been identified. In CUP patients who are non-responsive or relapse early after first-line platinum/taxane-based regimens, it is likely that gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumours may be overrepresented. These patients could be candidates for GI tract-directed therapy. We here report the results obtained with oxaliplatin and capecitabine as second-line therapy in 25 recurrent/refractory CUP patients following first-line treatment with paclitaxel, cisplatin and gemcitabine. Patients and methods. Patients received capecitabine orally (1000 mg/m2) twice daily, days 114, and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) intravenously on day 1 in a three-week schedule. Results. Twenty-five CUP patients received a median of three cycles of capecitabine and oxaliplatin as second-line treatment. Histopathological assessments suggested the primary site to be of GI tract origin in the majority of the patients (76%). We found an objective response rate of 13%, a median progression-free survival and overall survival rate of 2.3 and 3.9 months, respectively, and 32% of patients alive at one year after initiation of second-line therapy. The regimen was well tolerated by most patients. Conclusions. This study, demonstrates that there is still a significant need for improved second-line therapy in CUP patients.
U2 - 10.3109/02841861003649240
DO - 10.3109/02841861003649240
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0001-6357
VL - 49
SP - 431
EP - 435
JO - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
IS - 4
ER -