Book review: Evidence and Method: Scientific Strategies of Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell / Peter Achinstein. - Oxford University Press, New York, 2013

Abstract

In his book Evidence and Method: Scientific Strategies of Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell the renowned philosopher of science Peter Achinstein focuses on the question whether observed phenomena constitute evidence that a theory is true. Analyzing two central historical cases, he has mainly two goals: (1) To argue that by using his Rules for the Study of Natural Philosophy Newton was able to establish a universal law of gravitation to explain a range of phenomena, and (2) To describe three methods used by Maxwell when there were no sufficient evidence to establish a theory (or there was no theory available). The book is clearly written, aims at a general audience and provides valuable insights into the works of these two icons of modern science. Thus, it is warmly recommended for the readers of Science & Education. On the other hand, the book lacks historical grounding and its argumentation, at some points, appears to be based on personal convictions. The general feelin ...
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftScience & Education
Vol/bind23
Udgave nummer10
Sider (fra-til)2137-2148
ISSN0926-7220
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2014
Udgivet eksterntJa

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Book review: Evidence and Method: Scientific Strategies of Isaac Newton and James Clerk Maxwell / Peter Achinstein. - Oxford University Press, New York, 2013'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater