Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data?

Anne Ardila Brenøe*, Ramona Molitor

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde
8 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine birth order differences in health of newborns and follow the children throughout childhood using high-quality administrative data on individuals born in Denmark between 1981 and 2010. Family fixed effects models show a positive and robust effect of birth order on health at birth; firstborn children are less healthy at birth. During earlier pregnancies, women are more likely to smoke, receive more prenatal care, and are more likely to suffer a medical pregnancy complication, suggesting worse maternal health. We further show that the health disadvantage of firstborns persists in the first years of life, disappears by age seven, and becomes a health advantage in adolescence. In contrast, later-born children are throughout childhood more likely to suffer an injury. The results on health in adolescence are consistent with previous evidence of a firstborn advantage in education and with the hypothesis that postnatal investments differ between first- and later-born children.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Population Economics
Vol/bind31
Udgave nummer2
Sider (fra-til)363-395
ISSN0933-1433
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 apr. 2018

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Birth order and health of newborns: What can we learn from Danish registry data?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater