Between me and we: The importance of self-profit versus social justifiability for ethical decision making

S. A. Klein, Isabel Thielmann, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Ingo Zettler

    6 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Current theories of dishonest behavior suggest that both individual profits and the availability of justifications drive cheating. Although some evidence hints that cheating behavior is most prevalent when both self-profit and social justifications are present, the relative impact of each of these factors is insufficiently understood. This study provides a fine-grained analysis of the trade-off between self-profit versus social justifiability. In a non-student online sample, we assessed dishonest behavior in a coin-tossing task, involving six conditions which systematically varied both self-profit and social justifiability (in terms of social welfare), such that a decrease in the former was associated with the exact same increase in the latter. Results showed that self-profit outweighed social justifiability, but that there was also an effect of social justifications
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftJudgment and Decision Making
    Vol/bind12
    Udgave nummer6
    Sider (fra-til)563-571
    ISSN1930-2975
    StatusUdgivet - nov. 2017

    Emneord

    • Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultet

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Between me and we: The importance of self-profit versus social justifiability for ethical decision making'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater