Abstract
For every real number ß >1, the ß-shift is a dynamical system describing
iterations of the map x ¿ ßx mod 1 and is studied intensively in number theory.
Each ß-shift has an associated language of finite strings of characters; properties of this language are studied for the additional insight they give into the dynamics of the underlying system.
We prove that the language of the ß-shift is recursive iff ß is a computable real
number. That fact yields a precise characterization of the reals: The real numbers
ß for which we can compute arbitrarily good approximations—hence in particular
the numbers for which we can compute their expansion to some base—are precisely those for which there exists a program that decides for any finite sequence of digits whether the sequence occurs as a subword of some element of the ß-shift.
While the “only if” part of the proof of the above result is constructive, the “if” part
is not. We show that no constructive proof of the “if” part exists. Hence, there exists no algorithm that transforms a program computing arbitrarily good approximations of a real number ß into a program deciding the language of the ß-shift.
iterations of the map x ¿ ßx mod 1 and is studied intensively in number theory.
Each ß-shift has an associated language of finite strings of characters; properties of this language are studied for the additional insight they give into the dynamics of the underlying system.
We prove that the language of the ß-shift is recursive iff ß is a computable real
number. That fact yields a precise characterization of the reals: The real numbers
ß for which we can compute arbitrarily good approximations—hence in particular
the numbers for which we can compute their expansion to some base—are precisely those for which there exists a program that decides for any finite sequence of digits whether the sequence occurs as a subword of some element of the ß-shift.
While the “only if” part of the proof of the above result is constructive, the “if” part
is not. We show that no constructive proof of the “if” part exists. Hence, there exists no algorithm that transforms a program computing arbitrarily good approximations of a real number ß into a program deciding the language of the ß-shift.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Theory of Computing Systems |
| Vol/bind | 48 |
| Udgave nummer | 2 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 297-318 |
| ISSN | 1432-4350 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - feb. 2011 |