Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease

null EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare; Simon J. More; Anette Bøtner; Andrew Butterworth; Paolo Calistri; Klaus Depner; Sandra Edwards; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Margaret Good; Christian  Gortazar Schmidt; Virginie Michel; Miguel Angel Miranda; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Mohan Raj; Liisa Sihvonen; Hans Spoolder; Jan Arend Stegeman; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Antonio Velarde; Preben Willeberg; Christoph Winckler; Francesca Baldinelli; Alessandro Broglia; Sofie Dhollander; Beatriz Beltran-Beck; Lisa Kohnle; Dominique Bicout

doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, Simon J. More, Anette Bøtner, Andrew Butterworth, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Sandra Edwards, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Margaret Good, Christian Gortazar Schmidt, Virginie Michel, Miguel Angel Miranda, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Mohan Raj, Liisa Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Jan Arend Stegeman, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Antonio Velarde, Preben WillebergChristoph Winckler, Francesca Baldinelli, Alessandro Broglia, Sofie Dhollander, Beatriz Beltran-Beck, Lisa Kohnle, Dominique Bicout

8 Citationer (Scopus)

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to Borna disease. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, Borna disease cannot be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no compliance on criterion 5 A(v). Consequently, the assessment on compliance of Borna disease with the criteria as in Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in Article 9(1) is not applicable, as well as which animal species can be considered to be listed for Borna disease according to Article 8(3) of the AHL.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Artikelnummer	e04951
Tidsskrift	E F S A Journal
Vol/bind	15
Udgave nummer	7
Antal sider	33
ISSN	1831-4732
DOI	https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951
Status	Udgivet - 1 jul. 2017

Emneord

Borna disease, BDV, Animal Health Law, listing, categorisation, impact

Adgang til dokumentet

10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951Licens: CC BY-ND

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna diseaseForlagets udgivne version, 1,9 MBLicens: CC BY-ND

Citationsformater

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, More, S. J., Bøtner, A., Butterworth, A., Calistri, P., Depner, K., Edwards, S., Garin-Bastuji, B., Good, M., Gortazar Schmidt, C., Michel, V., Miranda, M. A., Nielsen, S. S., Raj, M., Sihvonen, L., Spoolder, H., Stegeman, J. A., Thulke, H.-H., Velarde, A., ... Bicout, D. (2017). Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease. E F S A Journal, 15(7), Artikel e04951. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951

EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, More, SJ, Bøtner, A, Butterworth, A, Calistri, P, Depner, K, Edwards, S, Garin-Bastuji, B, Good, M, Gortazar Schmidt, C, Michel, V, Miranda, MA, Nielsen, SS, Raj, M, Sihvonen, L, Spoolder, H, Stegeman, JA, Thulke, H-H, Velarde, A, Willeberg, P, Winckler, C, Baldinelli, F, Broglia, A, Dhollander, S, Beltran-Beck, B, Kohnle, L & Bicout, D 2017, 'Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease', E F S A Journal, bind 15, nr. 7, e04951. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951

@article{4ec262537ab54c389af5aef6c20e59ba,

title = "Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease",

abstract = "Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to Borna disease. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, Borna disease cannot be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no compliance on criterion 5 A(v). Consequently, the assessment on compliance of Borna disease with the criteria as in Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in Article 9(1) is not applicable, as well as which animal species can be considered to be listed for Borna disease according to Article 8(3) of the AHL.",

keywords = "Borna disease, BDV, Animal Health Law, listing, categorisation, impact",

author = "{EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare} and More, {Simon J.} and Anette B{\o}tner and Andrew Butterworth and Paolo Calistri and Klaus Depner and Sandra Edwards and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and Margaret Good and {Gortazar Schmidt}, Christian and Virginie Michel and Miranda, {Miguel Angel} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Mohan Raj and Liisa Sihvonen and Hans Spoolder and Stegeman, {Jan Arend} and Hans-Hermann Thulke and Antonio Velarde and Preben Willeberg and Christoph Winckler and Francesca Baldinelli and Alessandro Broglia and Sofie Dhollander and Beatriz Beltran-Beck and Lisa Kohnle and Dominique Bicout",

year = "2017",

month = jul,

day = "1",

doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

journal = "E F S A Journal",

issn = "1831-4732",

publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429)

T2 - Borna disease

AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare, null

AU - More, Simon J.

AU - Bøtner, Anette

AU - Butterworth, Andrew

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Depner, Klaus

AU - Edwards, Sandra

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Good, Margaret

AU - Gortazar Schmidt, Christian

AU - Michel, Virginie

AU - Miranda, Miguel Angel

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Raj, Mohan

AU - Sihvonen, Liisa

AU - Spoolder, Hans

AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend

AU - Thulke, Hans-Hermann

AU - Velarde, Antonio

AU - Willeberg, Preben

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - Baldinelli, Francesca

AU - Broglia, Alessandro

AU - Dhollander, Sofie

AU - Beltran-Beck, Beatriz

AU - Kohnle, Lisa

AU - Bicout, Dominique

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to Borna disease. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, Borna disease cannot be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no compliance on criterion 5 A(v). Consequently, the assessment on compliance of Borna disease with the criteria as in Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in Article 9(1) is not applicable, as well as which animal species can be considered to be listed for Borna disease according to Article 8(3) of the AHL.

AB - Borna disease has been assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on the eligibility of Borna disease to be listed, Article 9 for the categorisation of Borna disease according to disease prevention and control rules as in Annex IV and Article 8 on the list of animal species related to Borna disease. The assessment has been performed following a methodology composed of information collection and compilation, expert judgement on each criterion at individual and, if no consensus was reached before, also at collective level. The output is composed of the categorical answer, and for the questions where no consensus was reached, the different supporting views are reported. Details on the methodology used for this assessment are explained in a separate opinion. According to the assessment performed, Borna disease cannot be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention as laid down in Article 5(3) of the AHL because there was no compliance on criterion 5 A(v). Consequently, the assessment on compliance of Borna disease with the criteria as in Annex IV of the AHL, for the application of the disease prevention and control rules referred to in Article 9(1) is not applicable, as well as which animal species can be considered to be listed for Borna disease according to Article 8(3) of the AHL.

KW - Borna disease, BDV, Animal Health Law, listing, categorisation, impact

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4951

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1831-4732

VL - 15

JO - E F S A Journal

JF - E F S A Journal

IS - 7

M1 - e04951

ER -

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) No 2016/429): Borna disease

Abstract

Emneord

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater