Are Causal Laws a Relic of Bygone Age?

1 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Bertrand Russell once pointed out that modern science doesn’t deal with causal laws and that assuming otherwise is not only wrong but such thinking is erroneously thought to do no harm. However, looking into the scientific practice of simulation or experimentation reveals a general causal comprehension of physical processes. In this paper I trace causal experiences to the existence of innate causal capacity by which we organize sensory information. This capacity, I argue, is something we have got in virtue of natural selection as can be seen from experiments with intelligent animals like crows and chimpanzees. So understanding the empirical world is impossible without the use of causal categories. The reason why Russell believed that modern science does not refer to causal laws is, I think, because he argued that the laws of mathematical physics give us a non-causal description of reality. In contrast to such a claim I hold that theoretical laws are prescriptive rules of description rather than descriptions themselves.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftAxiomathes
Vol/bind27
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)653-666
Antal sider14
ISSN1122-1151
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 dec. 2017

Emneord

  • Det Humanistiske Fakultet

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Are Causal Laws a Relic of Bygone Age?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater