Antimicrobial resistance: Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin

D. Vose; J. Acar; F. Anthony; A. Franklin; R. Gupta; T. Nicholls; Y. Tamura; S. Thompson; E. J. Threlfall; M. Van Vuuren; D. G. Whiten; H. C. Wegener; M. L. Costarrica

doi:10.20506/rst.20.3.1319

Antimicrobial resistance: Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin

D. Vose^*, J. Acar, F. Anthony, A. Franklin, R. Gupta, T. Nicholls, Y. Tamura, S. Thompson, E. J. Threlfall, M. Van Vuuren, D. G. Whiten, H. C. Wegener, M. L. Costarrica

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Rektoratet

39 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The Ad hoc Group of experts on antimicrobial resistance, appointed by the Office International des Epizooties, has developed an objective, transparent and defensible risk analysis process, providing a valid basis for risk management decisions in respect to antimicrobial resistance. The components of risk analysis and of different possible approaches in risk assessment (qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative) are defined. The Ad hoc Group recommended the following: an independent risk assessment based on scientific data; an iterative risk analysis process; a qualitative risk assessment systematically undertaken before considering a quantitative approach; the establishment of a risk assessment policy; and the availability of technical assistance for developing countries.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique
Vol/bind	20
Udgave nummer	3
Sider (fra-til)	811-827
Antal sider	17
ISSN	0253-1933
DOI	https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.3.1319
Status	Udgivet - 1 jan. 2001

FN’s Verdensmål

Dette resultat bidrager til følgende verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

10.20506/rst.20.3.1319

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

Vose, D., Acar, J., Anthony, F., Franklin, A., Gupta, R., Nicholls, T., Tamura, Y., Thompson, S., Threlfall, E. J., Van Vuuren, M., Whiten, D. G., Wegener, H. C., & Costarrica, M. L. (2001). Antimicrobial resistance: Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 20(3), 811-827. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.3.1319

Vose, D, Acar, J, Anthony, F, Franklin, A, Gupta, R, Nicholls, T, Tamura, Y, Thompson, S, Threlfall, EJ, Van Vuuren, M, Whiten, DG, Wegener, HC & Costarrica, ML 2001, 'Antimicrobial resistance: Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin', OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, bind 20, nr. 3, s. 811-827. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.3.1319

@article{3e03d77ee2bd4c0b895fd48110f79bca,

title = "Antimicrobial resistance: Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin",

abstract = "The Ad hoc Group of experts on antimicrobial resistance, appointed by the Office International des Epizooties, has developed an objective, transparent and defensible risk analysis process, providing a valid basis for risk management decisions in respect to antimicrobial resistance. The components of risk analysis and of different possible approaches in risk assessment (qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative) are defined. The Ad hoc Group recommended the following: an independent risk assessment based on scientific data; an iterative risk analysis process; a qualitative risk assessment systematically undertaken before considering a quantitative approach; the establishment of a risk assessment policy; and the availability of technical assistance for developing countries.",

keywords = "Antimicrobial resistance, Containment of resistance, Food, Human medicine, International standards, Public health, Risk analysis, Risk assessment, Risk management, Veterinary medicine",

author = "D. Vose and J. Acar and F. Anthony and A. Franklin and R. Gupta and T. Nicholls and Y. Tamura and S. Thompson and Threlfall, {E. J.} and {Van Vuuren}, M. and Whiten, {D. G.} and Wegener, {H. C.} and Costarrica, {M. L.}",

year = "2001",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.20506/rst.20.3.1319",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "811--827",

journal = "O I E Revue Scientifique et Technique",

issn = "0253-1933",

publisher = "Organisation Mondiale de la Sante Animale (O I E)",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antimicrobial resistance

T2 - Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin

AU - Vose, D.

AU - Acar, J.

AU - Anthony, F.

AU - Franklin, A.

AU - Gupta, R.

AU - Nicholls, T.

AU - Tamura, Y.

AU - Thompson, S.

AU - Threlfall, E. J.

AU - Van Vuuren, M.

AU - Whiten, D. G.

AU - Wegener, H. C.

AU - Costarrica, M. L.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - The Ad hoc Group of experts on antimicrobial resistance, appointed by the Office International des Epizooties, has developed an objective, transparent and defensible risk analysis process, providing a valid basis for risk management decisions in respect to antimicrobial resistance. The components of risk analysis and of different possible approaches in risk assessment (qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative) are defined. The Ad hoc Group recommended the following: an independent risk assessment based on scientific data; an iterative risk analysis process; a qualitative risk assessment systematically undertaken before considering a quantitative approach; the establishment of a risk assessment policy; and the availability of technical assistance for developing countries.

AB - The Ad hoc Group of experts on antimicrobial resistance, appointed by the Office International des Epizooties, has developed an objective, transparent and defensible risk analysis process, providing a valid basis for risk management decisions in respect to antimicrobial resistance. The components of risk analysis and of different possible approaches in risk assessment (qualitative, semi-quantitative and quantitative) are defined. The Ad hoc Group recommended the following: an independent risk assessment based on scientific data; an iterative risk analysis process; a qualitative risk assessment systematically undertaken before considering a quantitative approach; the establishment of a risk assessment policy; and the availability of technical assistance for developing countries.

KW - Antimicrobial resistance

KW - Containment of resistance

KW - Food

KW - Human medicine

KW - International standards

KW - Public health

KW - Risk analysis

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Risk management

KW - Veterinary medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040927643&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.20506/rst.20.3.1319

DO - 10.20506/rst.20.3.1319

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 11732424

AN - SCOPUS:0040927643

SN - 0253-1933

VL - 20

SP - 811

EP - 827

JO - O I E Revue Scientifique et Technique

JF - O I E Revue Scientifique et Technique

IS - 3

ER -

Antimicrobial resistance: Risk analysis methodology for the potential impact on public health of antimicrobial resistant bacteria of animal origin

Abstract

FN’s Verdensmål

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater