An Arctic perspective on dating Mid-Late Pleistocene environmental history

Helena Alexanderson, Jan Backman, Thomas M. Cronin, Svend Visby Funder, Ólafur Ingólfsson, Martin Jakobsson, Jon Ytterbø Landvik, Ludwig Löwemark, Jan Mangerud, Christian März, Per Möller, Matt O'Regan, Robert F. Spielhagen

    28 Citationer (Scopus)

    Abstract

    To better understand Pleistocene climatic changes in the Arctic, integrated palaeoenvironmental and
    palaeoclimatic signals from a variety of marine and terrestrial geological records as well as geochronologic
    age control are required, not least for correlation to extra-Arctic records. In this paper we discuss,
    from an Arctic perspective, methods and correlation tools that are commonly used to date Arctic
    Pleistocene marine and terrestrial events. We review the state of the art of Arctic geochronology, with
    focus on factors that affect the possibility and quality of dating, and support this overview by examples of
    application of modern dating methods to Arctic terrestrial and marine sequences.
    Event stratigraphy and numerical ages are important tools used in the Arctic to correlate fragmented
    terrestrial records and to establish regional stratigraphic schemes. Age control is commonly provided by
    radiocarbon, luminescence or cosmogenic exposure ages. Arctic Ocean deep-sea sediment successions
    can be correlated over large distances based on geochemical and physical property proxies for sediment
    composition, patterns in palaeomagnetic records and, increasingly, biostratigraphic data. Many of these
    proxies reveal cyclical patterns that provide a basis for astronomical tuning.
    Recent advances in dating technology, calibration and age modelling allow for measuring smaller
    quantities of material and to more precisely date previously undatable material (i.e. foraminifera for 14C,
    and single-grain luminescence). However, for much of the Pleistocene there are still limits to the resolution
    of most dating methods. Consequently improving the accuracy and precision (analytical and
    geological uncertainty) of dating methods through technological advances and better understanding of
    processes are important tasks for the future. Another challenge is to better integrate marine and
    terrestrial records, which could be aided by targeting continental shelf and lake records, exploring
    proxies that occur in both settings, and by creating joint research networks that promote collaboration
    between marine and terrestrial geologists and modellers
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TidsskriftQuaternary Science Reviews
    Vol/bind92
    Sider (fra-til)9-31
    Antal sider23
    ISSN0277-3791
    DOI
    StatusUdgivet - 15 maj 2014

    Emneord

    • Det Natur- og Biovidenskabelige Fakultet
    • Arctic Chronology Dating methods Pleistocene Stratigraphy

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'An Arctic perspective on dating Mid-Late Pleistocene environmental history'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater