TY - JOUR
T1 - Algorithmic assemblages of care
T2 - imaginaries, epistemologies and repair work
AU - Schwennesen, Nete
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - In the past decade, thefigure of the algorithm has emerged as a matter of concernin discussions about the current state of the healthcare sector and what it maybecome. While analytical focus has mainly centred on‘algorithmic entities’, thepaper argues that we have to move our analytical focus towards‘algorithmicassemblages’, if we are to understand how advanced algorithms will affect healthcare. Departing from thisfigure, the paper explores how an algorithmic system,designed to‘take on’the role of a physiotherapist in physical rehabilitationprogrammes in Denmark, was designed and made to work in practice. On thebasis of ethnographicfieldwork, it is demonstrated that the algorithmic system is afragile accomplishment and outcome of negotiations between the imaginariesembedded in its design and the ongoing adjustments of IT workers, patients andprofessionals. Drawing on recent work on the fragility and incompleteness ofalgorithms, it is suggested that the algorithmic system needs to be creatively‘repaired’to build and maintain enabling connections between bodies in-motionand professionals in arrangements of care. The paper concludes by addressingaccountability for the workings of algorithmic systems in medical practice,suggesting that such questions must also be discussed in relation to encountersbetween algorithmic imaginaries, health professionals and patients, and the variousforms of‘repair work’needed to enable algorithmic systems to work in practice.Such acts of accountability cannot be understood within an ethics of transparency,but are better thought of as an ethics of‘response-ability’, given the need tointervene and engage with the open-ended outcomes of algorithmic systems.
AB - In the past decade, thefigure of the algorithm has emerged as a matter of concernin discussions about the current state of the healthcare sector and what it maybecome. While analytical focus has mainly centred on‘algorithmic entities’, thepaper argues that we have to move our analytical focus towards‘algorithmicassemblages’, if we are to understand how advanced algorithms will affect healthcare. Departing from thisfigure, the paper explores how an algorithmic system,designed to‘take on’the role of a physiotherapist in physical rehabilitationprogrammes in Denmark, was designed and made to work in practice. On thebasis of ethnographicfieldwork, it is demonstrated that the algorithmic system is afragile accomplishment and outcome of negotiations between the imaginariesembedded in its design and the ongoing adjustments of IT workers, patients andprofessionals. Drawing on recent work on the fragility and incompleteness ofalgorithms, it is suggested that the algorithmic system needs to be creatively‘repaired’to build and maintain enabling connections between bodies in-motionand professionals in arrangements of care. The paper concludes by addressingaccountability for the workings of algorithmic systems in medical practice,suggesting that such questions must also be discussed in relation to encountersbetween algorithmic imaginaries, health professionals and patients, and the variousforms of‘repair work’needed to enable algorithmic systems to work in practice.Such acts of accountability cannot be understood within an ethics of transparency,but are better thought of as an ethics of‘response-ability’, given the need tointervene and engage with the open-ended outcomes of algorithmic systems.
KW - STS (Science and technology studies)
KW - algorithms
KW - repair work
KW - care arrangements
KW - accountability
KW - ethnography
U2 - 10.1111/1467-9566.12900
DO - 10.1111/1467-9566.12900
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31599986
SN - 0141-9889
VL - 41
SP - 176
EP - 192
JO - Sociology of Health and Illness
JF - Sociology of Health and Illness
IS - Supplement 1
ER -