A uniquely shaped rod improves curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Poul Martin Gehrchen; Søren Ohrt-Nissen; Dennis Winge Hallager; Benny Dahl

doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504

A uniquely shaped rod improves curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Poul Martin Gehrchen, Søren Ohrt-Nissen^*, Dennis Winge Hallager, Benny Dahl

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Institut for Klinisk Medicin

7 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Design. A retrospective cohort study.

Objective. The aim of this study is to determine the initial curve correction in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using either beam-like rods (BRs) or traditional circular rods (CRs).

Summary of Background Data. Posterior fusion using all pedicle screw instrumentation has become the standard for the surgical treatment of AIS. Traditionally, the rod is circular in the cross-sectional plane. Recent biomechanical studies suggest that a beam-like structure of the rod may enhance the stiffness of the construct and thereby possibly improve curve correction.

Methods. Two consecutive series of patients surgically treated for AIS between May 2011 and May 2015 were included in the study. Patients were all treated with an ultralow profile all-pedicle screw implant system. In the first series, conventional 5.5mm CoCr CR were used, and in the second series, 5.5mm CoCr BR were used. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs preoperatively and within seven days after surgery were used to measure the correction obtained.

Results. The first 60 patients were operated with CR and the subsequent 69 with BR. There was no statistical difference in age, gender, preoperative curve magnitude, Lenke type, or number of levels instrumented (P=0.451). Major curve correction was significantly better in the BR group than in the CR group (66 vs. 57%) (P<0.001). We found no difference in preoperative flexibility, secondary curve correction, sagittal balance, or coronal balance (P>0.058). A postoperative decrease in thoracic kyphosis was seen with no significant difference between groups. Median T5-T12 change was -7° versus -3° for BR and CR, respectively (P=0.051).

Conclusion. A BR design results in a significantly better curve correction than conventional rods, but the difference is moderate and the clinical value is uncertain.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Spine
Vol/bind	41
Udgave nummer	14
Sider (fra-til)	1139-1145
Antal sider	7
ISSN	0362-2436
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504
Status	Udgivet - 2016

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504

Citationsformater

@article{5d9cacf376b84743ad152e96dbb79c1f,

title = "A uniquely shaped rod improves curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis",

abstract = "Study Design. A retrospective cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study is to determine the initial curve correction in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using either beam-like rods (BRs) or traditional circular rods (CRs). Summary of Background Data. Posterior fusion using all pedicle screw instrumentation has become the standard for the surgical treatment of AIS. Traditionally, the rod is circular in the cross-sectional plane. Recent biomechanical studies suggest that a beam-like structure of the rod may enhance the stiffness of the construct and thereby possibly improve curve correction. Methods. Two consecutive series of patients surgically treated for AIS between May 2011 and May 2015 were included in the study. Patients were all treated with an ultralow profile all-pedicle screw implant system. In the first series, conventional 5.5mm CoCr CR were used, and in the second series, 5.5mm CoCr BR were used. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs preoperatively and within seven days after surgery were used to measure the correction obtained. Results. The first 60 patients were operated with CR and the subsequent 69 with BR. There was no statistical difference in age, gender, preoperative curve magnitude, Lenke type, or number of levels instrumented (P=0.451). Major curve correction was significantly better in the BR group than in the CR group (66 vs. 57%) (P<0.001). We found no difference in preoperative flexibility, secondary curve correction, sagittal balance, or coronal balance (P>0.058). A postoperative decrease in thoracic kyphosis was seen with no significant difference between groups. Median T5-T12 change was -7° versus -3° for BR and CR, respectively (P=0.051). Conclusion. A BR design results in a significantly better curve correction than conventional rods, but the difference is moderate and the clinical value is uncertain.",

keywords = "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, beam-like rod, circular rod, curve correction, pedicle screw implant, posterior fusion, rod stiffness, surgical fusion, thoracic kyphosis, ultralow profile screw",

author = "Gehrchen, {Poul Martin} and S{\o}ren Ohrt-Nissen and Hallager, {Dennis Winge} and Benny Dahl",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504",

language = "English",

volume = "41",

pages = "1139--1145",

journal = "Spine",

issn = "0362-2436",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",

number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A uniquely shaped rod improves curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

AU - Gehrchen, Poul Martin

AU - Ohrt-Nissen, Søren

AU - Hallager, Dennis Winge

AU - Dahl, Benny

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Study Design. A retrospective cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study is to determine the initial curve correction in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using either beam-like rods (BRs) or traditional circular rods (CRs). Summary of Background Data. Posterior fusion using all pedicle screw instrumentation has become the standard for the surgical treatment of AIS. Traditionally, the rod is circular in the cross-sectional plane. Recent biomechanical studies suggest that a beam-like structure of the rod may enhance the stiffness of the construct and thereby possibly improve curve correction. Methods. Two consecutive series of patients surgically treated for AIS between May 2011 and May 2015 were included in the study. Patients were all treated with an ultralow profile all-pedicle screw implant system. In the first series, conventional 5.5mm CoCr CR were used, and in the second series, 5.5mm CoCr BR were used. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs preoperatively and within seven days after surgery were used to measure the correction obtained. Results. The first 60 patients were operated with CR and the subsequent 69 with BR. There was no statistical difference in age, gender, preoperative curve magnitude, Lenke type, or number of levels instrumented (P=0.451). Major curve correction was significantly better in the BR group than in the CR group (66 vs. 57%) (P<0.001). We found no difference in preoperative flexibility, secondary curve correction, sagittal balance, or coronal balance (P>0.058). A postoperative decrease in thoracic kyphosis was seen with no significant difference between groups. Median T5-T12 change was -7° versus -3° for BR and CR, respectively (P=0.051). Conclusion. A BR design results in a significantly better curve correction than conventional rods, but the difference is moderate and the clinical value is uncertain.

AB - Study Design. A retrospective cohort study. Objective. The aim of this study is to determine the initial curve correction in patients surgically treated for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using either beam-like rods (BRs) or traditional circular rods (CRs). Summary of Background Data. Posterior fusion using all pedicle screw instrumentation has become the standard for the surgical treatment of AIS. Traditionally, the rod is circular in the cross-sectional plane. Recent biomechanical studies suggest that a beam-like structure of the rod may enhance the stiffness of the construct and thereby possibly improve curve correction. Methods. Two consecutive series of patients surgically treated for AIS between May 2011 and May 2015 were included in the study. Patients were all treated with an ultralow profile all-pedicle screw implant system. In the first series, conventional 5.5mm CoCr CR were used, and in the second series, 5.5mm CoCr BR were used. Antero-posterior and lateral radiographs preoperatively and within seven days after surgery were used to measure the correction obtained. Results. The first 60 patients were operated with CR and the subsequent 69 with BR. There was no statistical difference in age, gender, preoperative curve magnitude, Lenke type, or number of levels instrumented (P=0.451). Major curve correction was significantly better in the BR group than in the CR group (66 vs. 57%) (P<0.001). We found no difference in preoperative flexibility, secondary curve correction, sagittal balance, or coronal balance (P>0.058). A postoperative decrease in thoracic kyphosis was seen with no significant difference between groups. Median T5-T12 change was -7° versus -3° for BR and CR, respectively (P=0.051). Conclusion. A BR design results in a significantly better curve correction than conventional rods, but the difference is moderate and the clinical value is uncertain.

KW - adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

KW - beam-like rod

KW - circular rod

KW - curve correction

KW - pedicle screw implant

KW - posterior fusion

KW - rod stiffness

KW - surgical fusion

KW - thoracic kyphosis

KW - ultralow profile screw

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001504

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26890957

AN - SCOPUS:84958780975

SN - 0362-2436

VL - 41

SP - 1139

EP - 1145

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

IS - 14

ER -

A uniquely shaped rod improves curve correction in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater