A quackery with a difference: new medical pluralism and the problem of 'dangerous practitioners' in the United Kingdom

Ayo Wahlberg

doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024

A quackery with a difference: new medical pluralism and the problem of 'dangerous practitioners' in the United Kingdom

Ayo Wahlberg

45 Citationer (Scopus)

1528 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The figure of the ‘miracle cure’-peddling quack pretending spectacular properties for worthless tonics is iconic. From their 19th century traveling wagon shows to their 21st century Internet spam scams, hucksters and cranks have been consistently targeted by health authorities as a danger to public health. Yet, in this paper, I argue that this is only one form that the problem of ‘quackery’ has taken in the past two centuries or so in the United Kingdom. Just as Roy Porter showed how the mid-19th century professionalization of medicine gave rise to a ‘quackery with a difference’ as a whole range of new medical movements—homoeopathy, hydropathy, medical botany, mesmerism—actively denounced allopathic or modern medicine, I will suggest that the late 20th century birth of ‘complementary and alternative medicine’ (CAM) has resulted in yet another transformation in quackery. By examining the ways in which regulatory authorities in the UK have come to address what is invariably described as a ‘growing interest in CAM’, I will show how the problem of quackery today is increasingly located in an ethical field of practitioner competency, qualifications, conduct, responsibility and personal professional development, almost (but not quite) regardless of the form of therapy in question.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Social Science & Medicine
Vol/bind	65
Udgave nummer	11
Sider (fra-til)	2307-2316
Antal sider	9
ISSN	0277-9536
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024
Status	Udgivet - 2007

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024

Wahlberg.2007.AquackerywithadifferenceIndsendt manuskript, 105 KB

Citationsformater

@article{f80ac840c9ea11deb58f000ea68e967b,

title = "A quackery with a difference: new medical pluralism and the problem of 'dangerous practitioners' in the United Kingdom",

abstract = "The figure of the {\textquoteleft}miracle cure{\textquoteright}-peddling quack pretending spectacular properties for worthless tonics is iconic. From their 19th century traveling wagon shows to their 21st century Internet spam scams, hucksters and cranks have been consistently targeted by health authorities as a danger to public health. Yet, in this paper, I argue that this is only one form that the problem of {\textquoteleft}quackery{\textquoteright} has taken in the past two centuries or so in the United Kingdom. Just as Roy Porter showed how the mid-19th century professionalization of medicine gave rise to a {\textquoteleft}quackery with a difference{\textquoteright} as a whole range of new medical movements—homoeopathy, hydropathy, medical botany, mesmerism—actively denounced allopathic or modern medicine, I will suggest that the late 20th century birth of {\textquoteleft}complementary and alternative medicine{\textquoteright} (CAM) has resulted in yet another transformation in quackery. By examining the ways in which regulatory authorities in the UK have come to address what is invariably described as a {\textquoteleft}growing interest in CAM{\textquoteright}, I will show how the problem of quackery today is increasingly located in an ethical field of practitioner competency, qualifications, conduct, responsibility and personal professional development, almost (but not quite) regardless of the form of therapy in question.",

author = "Ayo Wahlberg",

note = "Paper id:: doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024",

year = "2007",

doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024",

language = "English",

volume = "65",

pages = "2307--2316",

journal = "Social Science & Medicine",

issn = "0277-9536",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quackery with a difference

T2 - new medical pluralism and the problem of 'dangerous practitioners' in the United Kingdom

AU - Wahlberg, Ayo

N1 - Paper id:: doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The figure of the ‘miracle cure’-peddling quack pretending spectacular properties for worthless tonics is iconic. From their 19th century traveling wagon shows to their 21st century Internet spam scams, hucksters and cranks have been consistently targeted by health authorities as a danger to public health. Yet, in this paper, I argue that this is only one form that the problem of ‘quackery’ has taken in the past two centuries or so in the United Kingdom. Just as Roy Porter showed how the mid-19th century professionalization of medicine gave rise to a ‘quackery with a difference’ as a whole range of new medical movements—homoeopathy, hydropathy, medical botany, mesmerism—actively denounced allopathic or modern medicine, I will suggest that the late 20th century birth of ‘complementary and alternative medicine’ (CAM) has resulted in yet another transformation in quackery. By examining the ways in which regulatory authorities in the UK have come to address what is invariably described as a ‘growing interest in CAM’, I will show how the problem of quackery today is increasingly located in an ethical field of practitioner competency, qualifications, conduct, responsibility and personal professional development, almost (but not quite) regardless of the form of therapy in question.

AB - The figure of the ‘miracle cure’-peddling quack pretending spectacular properties for worthless tonics is iconic. From their 19th century traveling wagon shows to their 21st century Internet spam scams, hucksters and cranks have been consistently targeted by health authorities as a danger to public health. Yet, in this paper, I argue that this is only one form that the problem of ‘quackery’ has taken in the past two centuries or so in the United Kingdom. Just as Roy Porter showed how the mid-19th century professionalization of medicine gave rise to a ‘quackery with a difference’ as a whole range of new medical movements—homoeopathy, hydropathy, medical botany, mesmerism—actively denounced allopathic or modern medicine, I will suggest that the late 20th century birth of ‘complementary and alternative medicine’ (CAM) has resulted in yet another transformation in quackery. By examining the ways in which regulatory authorities in the UK have come to address what is invariably described as a ‘growing interest in CAM’, I will show how the problem of quackery today is increasingly located in an ethical field of practitioner competency, qualifications, conduct, responsibility and personal professional development, almost (but not quite) regardless of the form of therapy in question.

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.024

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 17719708

SN - 0277-9536

VL - 65

SP - 2307

EP - 2316

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

IS - 11

ER -