Aktiviteter pr. år
Abstract
We argue that non-experimental impact estimators will continue to be needed for evaluations of interventions in developing countries as social experiments, for various reasons, will never be the most preferred approach. In a survey of four studies that empirically compare the performance of experimental and non-experimental impact estimates using data from development interventions, we show that the preferred non-experimental estimators are unbiased. We try to explain the reasons why the non-experimental estimators perform better in the context of development interventions than American job-market interventions. We also use the survey as a source for suggestions for implementation and assessment of non-experimental impact evaluations. Our main suggestion is to be more careful and precise in the formulation of the statistical model for the assignment into the program and also to use the assignment information for model-based systematic sampling.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Udgiver | Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen |
Antal sider | 25 |
Status | Udgivet - dec. 2011 |
Navn | FOI Working Paper |
---|---|
Nummer | 2011/16 |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'A comparison of model-based and design-based impact evaluations of interventions in developing countries'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Aktiviteter
- 1 Foredrag og mundtlige bidrag
-
A Comparison of Model-based and Design-basedImpact Evaluations in Developing Countries
Hansen, H. (Foredragsholder)
22 jun. 2012Aktivitet: Tale eller præsentation - typer › Foredrag og mundtlige bidrag