A Comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice

Clement Salung Petersen

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1

A Comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice

Clement Salung Petersen

CEPRI - Centre for Private Governance

2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

The civil justice systems of Denmark, Norway and Sweden Sweden have much in common even though they, unlike other important areas of law, have not been subject to a formal Nordic legislative cooperation. This paper explores recent reforms of civil justice in Denmark, Norway and Sweden from a comparative perspective. The purpose is to identify and compare the general purposes and fundamental values, as well as some important general principles behind these Nordic civil justice systems, and to discuss to what extent they reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice. The analyses show that these civil justice systems today generally aim to fulfill the same purposes and are essentially based on the same fundamental values and general principles and that these purposes, values and principles largely reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	The Future of Civil Litigation : Access to Courts and Court-Annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries
Redaktører	Laura Ervo, Anna Nylund
Antal sider	21
Udgivelsessted	Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London
Forlag	Springer
Publikationsdato	1 dec. 2014
Sider	9-29
ISBN (Trykt)	978-3-319-04464-4
ISBN (Elektronisk)	978-3-319-04465-1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1
Status	Udgivet - 1 dec. 2014

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1

Citationsformater

A Comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice. / Petersen, Clement Salung.
The Future of Civil Litigation: Access to Courts and Court-Annexed Mediation in the Nordic Countries. red. / Laura Ervo; Anna Nylund. Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London: Springer, 2014. s. 9-29.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › peer review

@inbook{c4f7f6b0ed65479dae774e0ac383e5f0,

title = "A Comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice",

abstract = "The civil justice systems of Denmark, Norway and Sweden Sweden have much in common even though they, unlike other important areas of law, have not been subject to a formal Nordic legislative cooperation. This paper explores recent reforms of civil justice in Denmark, Norway and Sweden from a comparative perspective. The purpose is to identify and compare the general purposes and fundamental values, as well as some important general principles behind these Nordic civil justice systems, and to discuss to what extent they reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice. The analyses show that these civil justice systems today generally aim to fulfill the same purposes and are essentially based on the same fundamental values and general principles and that these purposes, values and principles largely reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice.",

author = "Petersen, {Clement Salung}",

year = "2014",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-3-319-04464-4",

pages = "9--29",

editor = "Laura Ervo and Anna Nylund",

booktitle = "The Future of Civil Litigation",

publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A Comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice

AU - Petersen, Clement Salung

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - The civil justice systems of Denmark, Norway and Sweden Sweden have much in common even though they, unlike other important areas of law, have not been subject to a formal Nordic legislative cooperation. This paper explores recent reforms of civil justice in Denmark, Norway and Sweden from a comparative perspective. The purpose is to identify and compare the general purposes and fundamental values, as well as some important general principles behind these Nordic civil justice systems, and to discuss to what extent they reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice. The analyses show that these civil justice systems today generally aim to fulfill the same purposes and are essentially based on the same fundamental values and general principles and that these purposes, values and principles largely reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice.

AB - The civil justice systems of Denmark, Norway and Sweden Sweden have much in common even though they, unlike other important areas of law, have not been subject to a formal Nordic legislative cooperation. This paper explores recent reforms of civil justice in Denmark, Norway and Sweden from a comparative perspective. The purpose is to identify and compare the general purposes and fundamental values, as well as some important general principles behind these Nordic civil justice systems, and to discuss to what extent they reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice. The analyses show that these civil justice systems today generally aim to fulfill the same purposes and are essentially based on the same fundamental values and general principles and that these purposes, values and principles largely reflect a common Nordic approach to civil justice.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-04465-1

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-3-319-04464-4

SP - 9

EP - 29

BT - The Future of Civil Litigation

A2 - Ervo, Laura

A2 - Nylund, Anna

PB - Springer

CY - Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London

ER -

A Comparative Perspective on Recent Nordic Reforms of Civil Justice

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater