A 2-year follow-up of involuntary admission's influence upon adherence and outcome in first-episode psychosis

S Opjordsmoen; S Friis; I Melle; U Haahr; J O Johannessen; T K Larsen; J I Røssberg; B R Rund; E Simonsen; P Vaglum; T H McGlashan

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x

A 2-year follow-up of involuntary admission's influence upon adherence and outcome in first-episode psychosis

S Opjordsmoen, S Friis, I Melle, U Haahr, J O Johannessen, T K Larsen, J I Røssberg, B R Rund, E Simonsen, P Vaglum, T H McGlashan

Institut for Klinisk Medicin

42 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To see, if voluntary admission for treatment in first-episode psychosis results in better adherence to treatment and more favourable outcome than involuntary admission.

METHOD: We compared consecutively first-admitted, hospitalised patients from a voluntary (n = 91) with an involuntary (n = 126) group as to psychopathology and functioning using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning Scales at baseline, after 3 months and at 2 year follow-up. Moreover, duration of supportive psychotherapy, medication and number of hospitalisations during the 2 years were measured.

RESULTS: More women than men were admitted involuntarily. Voluntary patients had less psychopathology and better functioning than involuntary patients at baseline. No significant difference as to duration of psychotherapy and medication between groups was found. No significant difference was found as to psychopathology and functioning between voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients at follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Legal admission status per se did not seem to influence treatment adherence and outcome.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Vol/bind	121
Udgave nummer	5
Sider (fra-til)	371-6
Antal sider	6
ISSN	0001-690X
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x
Status	Udgivet - maj 2010

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x

Citationsformater

Opjordsmoen, S., Friis, S., Melle, I., Haahr, U., Johannessen, J. O., Larsen, T. K., Røssberg, J. I., Rund, B. R., Simonsen, E., Vaglum, P., & McGlashan, T. H. (2010). A 2-year follow-up of involuntary admission's influence upon adherence and outcome in first-episode psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 121(5), 371-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x

@article{0c43e55b47bc41b4bd636da8cb136169,

title = "A 2-year follow-up of involuntary admission's influence upon adherence and outcome in first-episode psychosis",

abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To see, if voluntary admission for treatment in first-episode psychosis results in better adherence to treatment and more favourable outcome than involuntary admission.METHOD: We compared consecutively first-admitted, hospitalised patients from a voluntary (n = 91) with an involuntary (n = 126) group as to psychopathology and functioning using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning Scales at baseline, after 3 months and at 2 year follow-up. Moreover, duration of supportive psychotherapy, medication and number of hospitalisations during the 2 years were measured.RESULTS: More women than men were admitted involuntarily. Voluntary patients had less psychopathology and better functioning than involuntary patients at baseline. No significant difference as to duration of psychotherapy and medication between groups was found. No significant difference was found as to psychopathology and functioning between voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients at follow-up.CONCLUSION: Legal admission status per se did not seem to influence treatment adherence and outcome.",

keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Antipsychotic Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Commitment of Mentally Ill, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Norway, Patient Admission, Patient Compliance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Psychotic Disorders, Sex Factors, Young Adult, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",

author = "S Opjordsmoen and S Friis and I Melle and U Haahr and Johannessen, {J O} and Larsen, {T K} and R{\o}ssberg, {J I} and Rund, {B R} and E Simonsen and P Vaglum and McGlashan, {T H}",

year = "2010",

month = may,

doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x",

language = "English",

volume = "121",

pages = "371--6",

journal = "Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica",

issn = "0001-690X",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A 2-year follow-up of involuntary admission's influence upon adherence and outcome in first-episode psychosis

AU - Opjordsmoen, S

AU - Friis, S

AU - Melle, I

AU - Haahr, U

AU - Johannessen, J O

AU - Larsen, T K

AU - Røssberg, J I

AU - Rund, B R

AU - Simonsen, E

AU - Vaglum, P

AU - McGlashan, T H

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To see, if voluntary admission for treatment in first-episode psychosis results in better adherence to treatment and more favourable outcome than involuntary admission.METHOD: We compared consecutively first-admitted, hospitalised patients from a voluntary (n = 91) with an involuntary (n = 126) group as to psychopathology and functioning using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning Scales at baseline, after 3 months and at 2 year follow-up. Moreover, duration of supportive psychotherapy, medication and number of hospitalisations during the 2 years were measured.RESULTS: More women than men were admitted involuntarily. Voluntary patients had less psychopathology and better functioning than involuntary patients at baseline. No significant difference as to duration of psychotherapy and medication between groups was found. No significant difference was found as to psychopathology and functioning between voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients at follow-up.CONCLUSION: Legal admission status per se did not seem to influence treatment adherence and outcome.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To see, if voluntary admission for treatment in first-episode psychosis results in better adherence to treatment and more favourable outcome than involuntary admission.METHOD: We compared consecutively first-admitted, hospitalised patients from a voluntary (n = 91) with an involuntary (n = 126) group as to psychopathology and functioning using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning Scales at baseline, after 3 months and at 2 year follow-up. Moreover, duration of supportive psychotherapy, medication and number of hospitalisations during the 2 years were measured.RESULTS: More women than men were admitted involuntarily. Voluntary patients had less psychopathology and better functioning than involuntary patients at baseline. No significant difference as to duration of psychotherapy and medication between groups was found. No significant difference was found as to psychopathology and functioning between voluntarily and involuntarily admitted patients at follow-up.CONCLUSION: Legal admission status per se did not seem to influence treatment adherence and outcome.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Antipsychotic Agents

KW - Combined Modality Therapy

KW - Commitment of Mentally Ill

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Female

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Norway

KW - Patient Admission

KW - Patient Compliance

KW - Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

KW - Psychotherapy

KW - Psychotic Disorders

KW - Sex Factors

KW - Young Adult

KW - Comparative Study

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01536.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20085554

SN - 0001-690X

VL - 121

SP - 371

EP - 376

JO - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

IS - 5

ER -

A 2-year follow-up of involuntary admission's influence upon adherence and outcome in first-episode psychosis

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater