Abstract
This article examines some of the difficulties of universalistic science in situations of deep conflict over global nature, using empirical material pertaining to ongoing controversies in the context of Japanese whaling practices. Within global-scale whaling assemblages since the 1970s, science has become a "post-sovereigna" authority, unable to impose any stable definition of nature on all actors. Instead, across spaces of deep antagonistic differences, anti- and pro-whalers now ontologically enact a multiplicity of mutually irreconcilable versions of whales. Empirically, the article attempts to map out a "cosmograma" of Japanese pro-whaling enactments of abundant and "killablea" whales. Following the political ecology of Bruno Latour, the global-scale situation is conceptualized as one of cosmopolitics, the politics of forging a common world across divergences in nature-cultures. Pointing to tensions inherent in this concept, the article ends by suggesting a move toward "agonistic cosmopolitics," in clarifying the constructive potentials of a Latourian anti-essentialist political ecology.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Science, Technology & Human Values |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 55-81 |
Number of pages | 27 |
ISSN | 0162-2439 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2011 |