Abstract
Laboratories have long been seen as reasonable proxies for user experience research. Yet, this assumption may have become unreliable. The trend toward multiple activities in the users' natural environment, where people simultaneously use a digital library, join a chat or read an incoming Facebook post, changes users' behavior. The effects of these disruptions generate a gap that is generally not taken into account in user-experience research. This paper presents a psychological experiment that measured how differently people behave in a laboratory and in a natural environment setting. The existence and impact of distraction is measured in a standard laboratory setting and in a remote setting that explicitly allows users to work in their own natural environment. The data indicates that there are significant differences between results from the laboratory and natural environment setting. Distractions like email or chat influence the users' performance and their ratings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Proceedings of the TPDL’11 Lecture Notes on Computer Science |
Pages (from-to) | 308-315 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- digital library
- user studies
- evaluation
- remote
- natural environment
- laboratory
- distraction