The extent of engagement, the means of invention: measuring debate about mirror neurons in the humanities and social sciences

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Mirror neurons (MN) — or neurons said to be able to "mirror" the sensed environment — have been widely popularized and referenced across many academic fields. Yet, MNs have also been the subject of considerable debate in the neurosciences. Using a criterion based sampling method and a citation analysis, this paper examines the extent of engagement with the neuroscience literature about MNs, looking specifically at the frequency of "MN debate sources" within articles published in the JSTOR and Communication and Mass Media (CMMC) databases. After reporting the results, the paper reviews characteristic examples in context and, ultimately, shows that MN debates remain largely absent from peer-reviewed articles published in JSTOR and CMMC. However, the paper suggests that this happens for good reason and that MNs retain the potential for inventive animations even though debates have gone largely unrecognized.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Science Communication
Volume15
Issue number2
Number of pages17
ISSN1824-2049
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The extent of engagement, the means of invention: measuring debate about mirror neurons in the humanities and social sciences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this