Swampman encounters an Immediate Object: Social and psychological reductions of signs: Some discussions of the critics of Natural Propositions

Frederik Stjernfelt

Abstract

This paper is a response to three reviews of the author's 2014 book Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce's Doctrine of Dicisigns, by Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Helmut Pape, and Göran Sonesson, respectively. Addressed here are issues like the Swampman argument and the character of Peirce's concept of "Immediate Object". A conclusion makes a general observation that semiotics is threatened by reductions of signs to sociological conventions on the one hand and mental phenomena on the other - arguing that communities as well as minds presuppose sign structure and use.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCognitive Semiotics
Volume8
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)155–172
Number of pages18
ISSN1662-1425
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2015

Keywords

  • Faculty of Humanities
  • propositions
  • dicisigns
  • peirce
  • semiotics
  • immediate object

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Swampman encounters an Immediate Object: Social and psychological reductions of signs: Some discussions of the critics of Natural Propositions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this