Abstract
This paper is a response to three reviews of the author's 2014 book Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce's Doctrine of Dicisigns, by Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, Helmut Pape, and Göran Sonesson, respectively. Addressed here are issues like the Swampman argument and the character of Peirce's concept of "Immediate Object". A conclusion makes a general observation that semiotics is threatened by reductions of signs to sociological conventions on the one hand and mental phenomena on the other - arguing that communities as well as minds presuppose sign structure and use.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Cognitive Semiotics |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 155–172 |
Number of pages | 18 |
ISSN | 1662-1425 |
Publication status | Published - 10 Nov 2015 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Humanities
- propositions
- dicisigns
- peirce
- semiotics
- immediate object