Regional bans on wild-bird trade modify invasion risks at a global scale

Laura Cardador, Matteo Lattuada, Diederik Strubbe, José L. Tella, Luís Reino, Rui Figueira, Martina Carrete

    25 Citations (Scopus)
    43 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Wildlife trade is currently the most important and increasing source of vertebrate invasive species. However, exhaustive analyses of potential side effects of trade regulations on this pathway of introduction are lacking. We addressed this by combining environmental niche models and global trade data on parrots (Psittaciformes), one of the most widely traded and worldwide invasive taxa. We used the wild bird trade bans of United States (1992) and Europe (2005) as case-studies. Results showed that regional bans can generate geographic redirections in trade, with important consequences on worldwide invasion risk. While the amount of parrots traded internationally remained largely constant, changes in trade destination occurred. Consequently, the world surface predicted at risk of parrot invasions increased with successive bans. Of concern, a redirection of trade toward developing countries was observed. Attention should be paid on the mismatch between the global requirements of invasion management and the regional scales governing trade regulations.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalConservation Letters
    Volume10
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)717-725
    Number of pages9
    ISSN1755-263X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Regional bans on wild-bird trade modify invasion risks at a global scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this