Abstract
As demonstrated in a recent laboratory experiment (see Sebald & Walzl, 2014), individuals tend to sanction others who subjectively evaluate their performance whenever this assessment falls short of the individuals’ self-evaluation. Interestingly, this is the case even if the individuals’ earnings are unaffected by the subjective performance appraisal. Hence, performance feedback which falls short of agents’ self- evaluations can be interpreted as an unkind act that triggers a negatively reciprocal response not only if the assessment determines agents’ earnings but also when it lacks monetary consequences. We propose a principal-agent model formalizing that agents might engage into conflict in response to ego-threatening performance appraisals and show that these conflicts stabilize principal-agent relationships based on subjective performance evaluations. In particular, we identify conditions for a positive welfare effect of increasing costs of conflict and a negative welfare effect of more capable agents.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Economic Psychology |
Volume | 47 |
Pages (from-to) | 62–76 |
Number of pages | 15 |
ISSN | 0167-4870 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2015 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Social Sciences
- Contracts
- Subjective evaluations
- Self-esteem
- Ego-threats
- Reciprocity