Optimal contracts based on subjective performance evaluations and reciprocity

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As demonstrated in a recent laboratory experiment (see Sebald & Walzl, 2014), individuals tend to sanction others who subjectively evaluate their performance whenever this assessment falls short of the individuals’ self-evaluation. Interestingly, this is the case even if the individuals’ earnings are unaffected by the subjective performance appraisal. Hence, performance feedback which falls short of agents’ self- evaluations can be interpreted as an unkind act that triggers a negatively reciprocal response not only if the assessment determines agents’ earnings but also when it lacks monetary consequences. We propose a principal-agent model formalizing that agents might engage into conflict in response to ego-threatening performance appraisals and show that these conflicts stabilize principal-agent relationships based on subjective performance evaluations. In particular, we identify conditions for a positive welfare effect of increasing costs of conflict and a negative welfare effect of more capable agents.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
    Volume47
    Pages (from-to)62–76
    Number of pages15
    ISSN0167-4870
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2015

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • Contracts
    • Subjective evaluations
    • Self-esteem
    • Ego-threats
    • Reciprocity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal contracts based on subjective performance evaluations and reciprocity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this