Observation of magnetic diffusion in the Earth's outer core from Magsat, Orsted, and CHAMP data

A. Chulliat, Nils Olsen

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The frozen flux assumption consists in neglecting magnetic diffusion in the core. It has been widely used to compute core flows from geomagnetic observations. Here we investigate the validity of this assumption over the time interval 1980-2005, using highprecision magnetic data from the Magsat, Ørsted, and CHAMP satellites. A detectable change of magnetic fluxes through patches delimited by curves of zero radial magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary is associated with a failure of the frozen flux assumption. For each epoch (1980 and 2005), we calculate spatially regularized models of the core field which we use to investigate the change of reversed magnetic flux at the core surface. The largest and most robust change of reversed flux is observed for two patches: one located under St. Helena Island (near 20°S, 15°E); the other, much larger, is located under the South Atlantic Ocean. We next calculate frozen-flux-constrained field models (i.e., pairs of models for epoch 1980 and 2005 having the same flux through patches delimited by curves of zero radial magnetic field), using a penalty method. We find that the frozen flux constraint does not lead to any significant increase of the global misfit. However, applying the constraint leads to a detectable increase of the scalar residuals at satellite altitude in the region of St. Helena, strongly suggesting a local failure of the frozen flux assumption. The observed flux expulsion within the St. Helena patch could result from the formation of a pair of "core spots," as predicted by numerical simulations of the geodynamo.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Volume115
Pages (from-to)B05105
ISSN1934-8843
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Observation of magnetic diffusion in the Earth's outer core from Magsat, Orsted, and CHAMP data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this