Major stressful life events in adulthood and risk of multiple sclerosis

Nete Munk Nielsen, Peter Bager, Jacob Simonsen, Anders Hviid, Egon Stenager, Henrik Brønnum-Hansen, Nils Koch-Henriksen, Morten Frisch

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear whether psychological stress is associated with increased risk of multiple sclerosis (MS). We studied the association between major stressful life events and MS in a nationwide cohort study using death of a child or a spouse or marital dissolution as indicators of severe stress. Methods: We created two study cohorts based on all Danish men and women born 1950-1992. One cohort consisted of all persons who became parents between 1968 and 2010, and another cohort consisted of all persons who married between 1968 and 2010. Members of both cohorts were followed for MS between 1982 and 2010 using data from the National Multiple Sclerosis Registry. Associations between major stressful life events and risk of MS were evaluated by means of MS incidence rate ratios (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) obtained in Poisson regression analyses. Results: During approximately 30 million person-years of follow-up, bereaved parents experienced no unusual risk of MS compared with parents who did not lose a child (RR=1.12 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.38)). Likewise, neither divorced (RR=0.98 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.06)) nor widowed (RR=0.98 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.32) persons were at any unusual risk of MS compared with married persons of the same sex. Conclusions: Our national cohort study provides little evidence for a causal association between major stressful life events (as exemplified by divorce or the loss of a child or a spouse) and subsequent MS risk.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume85
Pages (from-to)1103-1108
Number of pages6
ISSN0022-3050
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Major stressful life events in adulthood and risk of multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this