Long-term mortality after Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis: A Danish nationwide population-based cohort study

Theis Aagaard, Casper Roed, Anders R Larsen, Andreas Petersen, Benny Dahl, Peter Skinhøj, Niels Obel, Danish Staphylococcal Bacteraemia Study Group

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the long-term mortality and the causes of death after Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis. Methods: Nationwide, population-based cohort study using national registries of adults diagnosed with non-postoperative S. aureus spondylodiscitis from 1994-2009 and alive 1 year after diagnosis (n=313). A comparison cohort from the background population individually matched on sex and age was identified (n=1565). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and Poisson regression analyses used to estimate mortality rate ratios (MRR) adjusted for comorbidity. Results: 88 patients (28.1%) and 267 individuals from the population-based comparison cohort(17.1%) died. Un-adjusted MRR for S. aureus spondylodiscitis patients was 1.77 (95% CI, 1.39-2.25) and 1.32 (95% CI, 1.02-1.71) after adjustment for comorbidity. We observed increasedmortality due to infectious (MRR 8.57; 95% CI, 2.80-26.20), endocrine (MRR 3.57; 95% CI, 1.01-12.66), cardiovascular (MRR 1.59; 95% CI, 1.02-2.49), gastrointestinal (MRR3.21; 95% CI, 1.17-8.84) and alcohol and drug abuse-related (MRR 10.71; 95% CI, 3.23-35.58) diseases. Conclusions: Patients diagnosed with S. aureus spondylodiscitis have substantially increased long-term mortality, mainly due to comorbidity. To improve survival after S. aureus spondylodiscitis these patients should be screened for comorbidity and substance abuse predisposing to the disease.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Infection
Volume69
Issue number3
Pages (from-to)252–258
Number of pages7
ISSN0163-4453
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term mortality after Staphylococcus aureus spondylodiscitis: A Danish nationwide population-based cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this