Abstract
Much poverty and development research is not explicit about its methodology or philosophical foundations. Based on the extended case method of Burawoy and the epistemological standpoint of critical realism, this paper discusses a methodological approach for reflexive inductive livelihoods research that overcomes the unproductive social science dualism of positivism and social constructivism. The approach is linked to a conceptual framework and a menu of research methods that can be sequenced and iterated in light of research questions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Place of Publication | Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper 37, University of Manchester |
Number of pages | 33 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-906518-36-3 |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2008 |