Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transnasal endoscopy is well tolerated, but physiological benefits compared with conventional gastroscopy have not been studied in detail. The aims of this randomised study were to evaluate cardiopulmonary features, patient tolerance, and the endoscopist's evaluation of transnasal versus conventional endoscopy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to either a conventionally sized transoral (50 patients) or to a transnasal endoscopy (48 patients). Pulse rate and oxygen saturation were registered as well as the patient's tolerance and the endoscopist's evaluation of the procedure. RESULTS: The success rate for transnasal gastroscopy was 77%, mainly because of nasal stenosis. The per- and postendoscopy pulse rates of the conventional group were elevated compared with those of the transnasal group (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02). Procedural discomfort in the two groups was similar, but significantly fewer transnasal patients reported gagging (p < 0.01). The endoscopists evaluated the technical features as good even if they did not reach those of conventional gastroscopy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this study, transnasal gastroscopy was technically inferior to conventional gastroscopy. There was no benefit in terms of patient comfort, except for less gagging. A lower stress response was indicated by significantly lower pulse rates during transnasal than during conventional gastroscopy, but the clinical relevance of this finding needs to be further investigated.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Danish Medical Journal |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Pages (from-to) | A4432 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |