Abstract
In this issue of the Journal, Snowden et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(7):731–738) give a didactic explanation of G-computation as an approach for estimating the causal effect of a point exposure. The authors of the present commentary reinforce the idea that their use of G-computation is equivalent to a particular form of model-based standardization, whereby reference is made to the observed study population, a technique that epidemiologists have been applying for several decades. They comment on the use of standardized versus conditional effect measures and on the relative predominance of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting approach as opposed to G-computation. They further propose a compromise approach, doubly robust standardization, that combines the benefits of both of these causal inference techniques and is not more difficult to implement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | American Journal of Epidemiology |
Volume | 173 |
Issue number | 7 |
Pages (from-to) | 739-742 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISSN | 0002-9262 |
DOIs |
|
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2011 |