Invited commentary: G-Computation-Lost in Translation?

Stijn Vansteelandt, Niels Keiding

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this issue of the Journal, Snowden et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(7):731–738) give a didactic explanation of G-computation as an approach for estimating the causal effect of a point exposure. The authors of the present commentary reinforce the idea that their use of G-computation is equivalent to a particular form of model-based standardization, whereby reference is made to the observed study population, a technique that epidemiologists have been applying for several decades. They comment on the use of standardized versus conditional effect measures and on the relative predominance of the inverse probability-of-treatment weighting approach as opposed to G-computation. They further propose a compromise approach, doubly robust standardization, that combines the benefits of both of these causal inference techniques and is not more difficult to implement.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Epidemiology
Volume173
Issue number7
Pages (from-to)739-742
Number of pages4
ISSN0002-9262
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Invited commentary: G-Computation-Lost in Translation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this