Identification of residual leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia - Verification of leukemic state by flow-sorting and molecular/cytogenetic methods

Nina Friesgaard Obro, Lars Peter Ryder, Hans Ole Madsen, Mette Klarskov Andersen, Birgitte Lausen, Henrik Hasle, Kjeld Schmiegelow, Hanne Vibeke Marquart

    13 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Reduction in minimal residual disease, measured by real-time quantitative PCR or flow cytometry, predicts prognosis in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. We explored whether cells reported as minimal residual disease by flow cytometry represent the malignant clone harboring clone-specific genomic markers (53 follow-up bone marrow samples from 28 children with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia). Cell populations (presumed leukemic and non-leukemic) were flow-sorted during standard flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease monitoring and explored by PCR and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization. We found good concordance between flow cytometry and genomic analyses in the individual flow-sorted leukemic (93% true positive) and normal (93% true negative) cell populations. Four cases with discrepant results had plausible explanations (e.g. partly informative immunophenotype and antigen modulation) that highlight important methodological pitfalls. These findings demonstrate that with sufficient experience, flow cytometry is reliable for minimal residual disease monitoring in B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia, although rare cases require supplementary PCR-based monitoring.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalHaematologica
    Volume97
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)137-141
    ISSN0390-6078
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Identification of residual leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia - Verification of leukemic state by flow-sorting and molecular/cytogenetic methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this